Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 26202164
- PMCID: PMC4511246
- DOI: 10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6
Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Patient-centered care recognizes the obligation to understand and meet patient's expectations. An individual's satisfaction has been found to affect health-related decisions and treatment-related behaviours, which in turn affect medical compliance, follow-up, the success of treatment and the appropriate use of services. We studied the expectations, experiences and satisfaction of patients who participated in clinical trials for retinal diseases at the Sydney Eye Hospital.
Methods: The study was undertaken at the research clinic of the major public quaternary eye hospital in New South Wales, Australia. A 37-question survey was conducted on patients enrolled in or who had finished a clinical trial for macular disease in the 12 months preceding this study in November 2012. Patient satisfaction was assessed using close-ended, multiple choice questions. First, the decision making process for entering into the clinical trial was evaluated. Then the level of patient understanding and experience during the study was assessed. Finally, there was a series of questions to gauge the participants' perception of trial outcomes and overall impression gained from the experience.
Results: Eighty patients completed the questionnaire. Overall patient satisfaction was high with the majority of patients stating they would recommend participation in a retinal clinical trial (94 %) and participate in a subsequent trial (78 %). Most patients rated themselves as the most important factor in making the decision to join a trial. Patients felt well informed and expectations were generally felt to be met, however 14 % did not believe that they could withdraw from the study voluntarily. The most common reasons for trial participation were to contribute to medical science and to have improved treatment outcomes.
Conclusions: We found that patients generally found participation in retinal clinical trials to be a positive experience. Factors contributing to dissatisfaction mainly related to inconvenience experienced by transportation and waiting times. We also found that patients felt well informed about the study, but some did not have a complete understanding of their rights, which had been communicated to them when they entered the study. There were both altruistic and self-motivated reasons behind patients' decisions to join a retinal trial.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16242898
-
Patient satisfaction with clinical trial participation.Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Aug;10(4):319-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.319. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998. PMID: 9835248
-
The views of patients and healthy volunteers on participation in clinical trials: an exploratory survey study.Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jul;33(4):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.018. Epub 2012 Mar 3. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012. PMID: 22405971
-
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 22747798 Review.
-
Cancer patients' perceptions of factors influencing their decisions on participation in clinical drug trials: A qualitative meta-synthesis.J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jul;28(13-14):2443-2461. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14785. Epub 2019 Mar 3. J Clin Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30673153 Review.
Cited by
-
Perspectives of people with inherited retinal diseases on ocular gene therapy in Australia: protocol for a national survey.BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 22;11(6):e048361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048361. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34158306 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment satisfaction of patients undergoing ranibizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in a real-life setting.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 May 26;10:949-55. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S105536. eCollection 2016. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016. PMID: 27307715 Free PMC article.
-
Survey of perspectives of people with inherited retinal diseases on ocular gene therapy in Australia.Gene Ther. 2023 Apr;30(3-4):336-346. doi: 10.1038/s41434-022-00364-z. Epub 2022 Oct 2. Gene Ther. 2023. PMID: 36183012 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' satisfaction with ophthalmic counselling services in a tertiary hospital in Calabar, South-South Nigeria.Ghana Med J. 2020 Jun;54(2):76-81. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v54i2.4. Ghana Med J. 2020. PMID: 33536676 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment satisfaction of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents.Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;38(2):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0492-8. Epub 2017 Mar 11. Int Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 28285389
References
-
- Turnbull JE, Luther KM. Patient satisfaction report paves way to improved care. QRC Advisor. 1996;13(1):1–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous