Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul 14:7:179-81.
doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S78705. eCollection 2015.

Importance of perforating vessels in nipple-sparing mastectomy: an anatomical description

Affiliations

Importance of perforating vessels in nipple-sparing mastectomy: an anatomical description

Claudio Amanti et al. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). .

Abstract

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), understood as an oncologically valid procedure, is relatively new, and is an evolution of traditional mastectomy, particularly in relation to breast-conserving surgery. The anterior perforating branches are responsible for the cutaneous vascularization of the breast skin, and their preservation is a fundamental step to avoid possible postoperative necrosis. Therefore, evaluating the potential complications of cancer-related reconstructive surgical procedures such as NSM, both the distance of the tumoral lesion from the skin and the surgical incision site should be carefully considered. The preferred site of incision corresponds to the inframammary fold or possibly the periareolar area.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 113 patients who underwent NSM from January 2005 to October 2012 to evaluate skin complications. The anatomical study was performed by magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.

Results: Only one of the 113 women who had undergone a NSM procedure had total necrosis (0.9%) and six patients had partial necrosis (5.8%) of the nipple-areola complex.

Keywords: breast; breast anatomy; breast perforating vessels; magnetic resonance imaging; nipple-sparing mastectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Maximum intensity projection post-processing three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction images on axial (A) and sagittal (B) view. Notes: In (A), evidence of enlarged hyperemic anterior perforating arteries are shown on the left breast. In (B) this is well depicted in three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiographic images of the origin of the perforating anterior branches from the internal thoracic arteries.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maximum intensity projection post-processing three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiographic images on axial (A) and coronal (B) views. Notes: The right breast shows an enlarged hyperemic dorsal branch of the anterior perforating arteries, and (B) shows the origin of cutaneous and nipple-areolar vessels from the anterior perforating branch, known as “Major”.

References

    1. Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GPH. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:305–316. - PubMed
    1. Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Daniel JR, Gasgarth R, Carlson GW. Nipple-sparing mastectomy – technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:446–450. - PubMed
    1. Veronesi U, Stafyla V, Luini A, Veronesi P. Breast cancer: from “maximum tolerable” to “minimum effective” treatment. Front Oncol. 2012;2:125. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years’ experience at the European institute of Oncology of Milan (EIO) Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:333–338. - PubMed
    1. Chand M, Swan MC, Horlock N, Royle G. Preservation of the lateral thoracic vein in axillary dissection – its role in breast reconstruction using the DIEP flap. Breast. 2009;18:69–70. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources