Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;1(1):e29904.
doi: 10.4161/mco.29904.

Chromosomal Rearrangements in Cancer: Detection and potential causal mechanisms

Affiliations

Chromosomal Rearrangements in Cancer: Detection and potential causal mechanisms

Paul Hasty et al. Mol Cell Oncol. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Many cancers exhibit chromosomal rearrangements. These rearrangements can be simple with a single balanced fusion preserving the proper complement of genetic information or they can be complex with one or more fusions that distort this balance. A range of technological advances has improved our ability to detect and understand these rearrangements leading to speculation of causal mechanisms including defective DNA double strand break (DSB) repair and faulty DNA replication. A better understanding of these potential cancer-causing mechanisms will lead to novel therapeutic regimes to fight cancer. This review describes the technological advances used to detect simple and complex chromosomal rearrangements, cancers that exhibit these rearrangements, potential mechanisms that rearrange chromosomes and intervention strategies designed to specifically attack fusion gene products and causal DNA repair/synthesis pathways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. Replication fork maintenance and double strand break repair can either suppress or cause chromosomal rearrangements. BIR, break-induced replication; DSB, double-strand break; DSBR, double strand break repair; HR, homologous recombination; RF, replication fork; NHEJ, nonhomologous end joining; PRR; post replication repair; RFM, replication fork maintenance .

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Meyerson M, Pellman D. . Cancer genomes evolve by pulverizing single chromosomes. Cell 2011; 144:9 - 10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.025; PMID: 21215363 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rowley JD. . Letter: A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature 1973; 243:290 - 3; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/243290a0; PMID: 4126434 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerlinger M, Horswell S, Larkin J, Rowan AJ, Salm MP, Varela I, Fisher R, McGranahan N, Matthews N, Santos CR, et al. . . Genomic architecture and evolution of clear cell renal cell carcinomas defined by multiregion sequencing. Nat Genet 2014; 46:225 - 33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2891; PMID: 24487277 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klco JM, Spencer DH, Miller CA, Griffith M, Lamprecht TL, O’Laughlin M, Fronick C, Magrini V, Demeter RT, Fulton RS, et al. . . Functional heterogeneity of genetically defined subclones in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2014; 25:379 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.031; PMID: 24613412 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caspersson T, Zech L, Modest EJ, Foley GE, Wagh U, Simonsson E. . Chemical differentiation with fluorescent alkylating agents in Vicia faba metaphase chromosomes. Exp Cell Res 1969; 58:128 - 40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(69)90123-2; PMID: 5404060 - DOI - PubMed