Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 13;58(15):6195-213.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00776. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

High Affinity Dopamine D3 Receptor (D3R)-Selective Antagonists Attenuate Heroin Self-Administration in Wild-Type but not D3R Knockout Mice

Affiliations

High Affinity Dopamine D3 Receptor (D3R)-Selective Antagonists Attenuate Heroin Self-Administration in Wild-Type but not D3R Knockout Mice

Comfort A Boateng et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

The dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) is a promising target for the development of pharmacotherapeutics to treat substance use disorders. Several D3R-selective antagonists are effective in animal models of drug abuse, especially in models of relapse. Nevertheless, poor bioavailability, metabolic instability, and/or predicted toxicity have impeded success in translating these drug candidates to clinical use. Herein, we report a series of D3R-selective 4-phenylpiperazines with improved metabolic stability. A subset of these compounds was evaluated for D3R functional efficacy and off-target binding at selected 5-HT receptor subtypes, where significant overlap in SAR with D3R has been observed. Several high affinity D3R antagonists, including compounds 16 (Ki = 0.12 nM) and 32 (Ki = 0.35 nM), showed improved metabolic stability compared to the parent compound, PG648 (6). Notably, 16 and the classic D3R antagonist SB277011A (2) were effective in reducing self-administration of heroin in wild-type but not D3R knockout mice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Chart 1
Chart 1. Selected Lead D3R-Selective Antagonists and Partial Agonists
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4-(4-Arylpiperazine)butylamine Intermediates
Reagents and conditions: (a) 3-chloro-2-methoxyaniline or naphthalen-1-amine, K2CO3, bis(2-chloroethyl)amine HCl, diglyme, reflux, 48 h; (b) appropriate 4-arylpiperazine, 2-propanol, reflux, overnight; (c) hydrazine (anhydrous), EtOH, reflux, 2–3 h.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Target Compounds 1437
Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI), THF, room temperature, 2 h; (ii) appropriate 4-arylpiperazine amine, THF, 0 °C to room temperature, overnight.
Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Phase I metabolism data for all compounds with an unsubstituted linker chain. (b) Phase I metabolism data for all compounds with a 3-OH substituted linker chain. (c) Phase I metabolism data for all quinoline compounds. (d) Phase I metabolism data for all indole compounds.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of compound 2 on heroin self-administration in WT and D3KO mice. All the data are expressed as mean ± SEM. (A) Total numbers of heroin infusions after injection of each dose of compound 2. (B) Normalized data showing drug-induced % change in heroin self-administration over new basal levels immediately before each test day. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures over drug dose revealed a significant drug treatment main effect in WT mice ((A) F3,24 = 10.93, p < 0.001; (B) F3,24 = 13.06, p < 0.001) but not in D3KO mice ((A) F3,12 = 2.21, p > 0.05; (B) F3,12 = 1.46, p > 0.05). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, compared to vehicle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of compound 16 on heroin self-administration in WT and D3R-KO mice. All the data are expressed as mean ± SEM. (A) Total numbers of heroin infusions after injection of each dose of compound 16. (B) Normalized data showing drug-induced % change in heroin self-administration over new baseline immediately before each test day. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures over drug dose revealed a statistically significant drug treatment main effect in WT mice ((A) F3,18 = 2.13, p > 0.05; (B) F3,18 = 9.09, p < 0.001) but not in D3KO mice ((A) F3,18 = 0.63, p > 0.05; (B) D3KO, F3,18 = 1.78, p > 0.05). We note that one-way ANOVA did not reveal a significant treatment main effect for the data shown in (A) WT mice. However, the direct two group comparison between the vehicle and 10 mg/kg 16 groups revealed a statistically significant reduction ((A) WT, paired t test, q = 5.07, p < 0.05). These may be related to the relatively smaller group size and/or the relatively variable basal levels of heroin self-administration in different subjects. Therefore, the renormalized data (% change over baseline) are provided ((B) in this figure; the same as in Figures 2B and 4B) in this study. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, compared to vehicle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of compound 32 on heroin self-administration in WT and D3KO mice. All the data are expressed as mean ± SEM. (A) Total numbers of heroin infusions after injection of each dose of compound 32. (B) Normalized data showing drug-induced % change in heroin self-administration over new baseline immediately before each test day. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures over drug dose revealed a statistically significant drug treatment main effect in WT mice ((A) F3,18 = 0.83, p > 0.05; (B) F3,18 = 3.34, p < 0.05) and D3KO mice ((A) F3,15 = 3.63, p < 0.05; (B) F3,15 = 4.39, p < 0.05) *p < 0.05, compared to vehicle.

References

    1. Ye N.; Neumeyer J. L.; Baldessarini R. J.; Zhen X.; Zhang A. Update 1 of: Recent progress in development of dopamine receptor subtype-selective agents: potential therapeutics for neurological and psychiatric disorders. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, PR123–178. 10.1021/cr300113a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heidbreder C. A.; Newman A. H. Current perspectives on selective dopamine D(3) receptor antagonists as pharmacotherapeutics for addictions and related disorders. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1187, 4–34. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05149.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gurevich E. V.; Joyce J. N. Distribution of dopamine D3 receptor expressing neurons in the human forebrain: comparison with D2 receptor expressing neurons. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999, 20, 60–80. 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00066-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Newman A. H.; Blaylock B. L.; Nader M. A.; Bergman J.; Sibley D. R.; Skolnick P. Medication discovery for addiction: translating the dopamine D3 receptor hypothesis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012, 84, 882–890. 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.06.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Micheli F.; Heidbreder C. Dopamine D3 receptor antagonists: a patent review (2007 - 2012). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2013, 23, 363–381. 10.1517/13543776.2013.757593. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types