Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;33(3):212-9.
doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1067517. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

Patients, health information, and guidelines: A focus-group study

Helena Liira  1   2 , Osmo Saarelma  3 , Margaret Callaghan  4 , Robin Harbour  4 , Jukkapekka Jousimaa  3 , Ilkka Kunnamo  2   3 , Kirsty Loudon  5 , Emma Mcfarlane  6 , Shaun Treweek  7
Affiliations

Patients, health information, and guidelines: A focus-group study

Helena Liira et al. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015.

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based clinical guidelines could support shared decision-making and help patients to participate actively in their care. However, it is not well known how patients view guidelines as a source of health information. This qualitative study aimed to assess what patients know about guidelines, and what they think of their presentation formats.

Research question: What is the role of guidelines as health information for patients and how could the implementation of evidence-based information for patients be improved?

Methods: A qualitative study with focus groups that were built around a semi-structured topic guide. Focus groups were audiotaped and transcribed and analysed using a phenomenographic approach.

Results: Five focus groups were carried out in 2012 with a total of 23 participants. Patients searched for health information from the Internet or consulted health professionals or their personal networks. The concepts of guidelines included instructions or standards for health professionals, information given by a health professional to the patient, and material to protect and promote the interests of patients. Some patients did not have a concept for guidelines. Patients felt that health information was abundant and its quality sometimes difficult to assess. They respected conciseness, clarity, clear structure, and specialists or well-known organizations as authors of health information. Patients would like health professionals to deliver and clarify written materials to them or point out to them the relevant Internet sites.

Conclusions: The concept of guidelines was not well known among our interviewees; however, they expressed an interest in having more communication on health information, both written information and clarifications with their health professionals.

Keywords: Clinical guidelines; Finland; concepts; focus groups; general practice; patient information; patient versions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Drawing presenting two patients with different cardiovascular risks that was presented to the focus-group participants.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Bar chart presenting two patients with different cardiovascular risks that was presented to the focus-group participants.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Santesso N, Rader T, Nilsen ES, Glenton C, Rosenbaum S, Ciapponi A, et al. . A summary to communicate evidence from systematic reviews to the public improved understanding and accessibility of information: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:182–90. - PubMed
    1. Loudon K, Santesso N, Callaghan M, Thornton J, Harbour J, Graham K, Harbour R, Kunnamo I, Liira H, McFarlane E, Ritchie K, Treweek S. Patient and public attitudes to and awareness of clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review with thematic and narrative syntheses. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:321. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development, 10: Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:22. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-4-22. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines, available at: http://www.g-i-n.net/working-groups/gin-public/toolkit (accessed 21 August 2014).
    1. Epstein RM, Alper BS, Quill TE. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA 2004;291:2359–66. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources