Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 Aug;221(2):291-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 May 5.

Number of Lymph Nodes Removed and Survival after Gastric Cancer Resection: An Analysis from the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Number of Lymph Nodes Removed and Survival after Gastric Cancer Resection: An Analysis from the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative

Sepideh Gholami et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Examination of at least 16 lymph nodes (LNs) has been traditionally recommended during gastric adenocarcinoma resection to optimize staging, but the impact of this strategy on survival is uncertain. Because recent randomized trials have demonstrated a therapeutic benefit from extended lymphadenectomy, we sought to investigate the impact of the number of LNs removed on prognosis after gastric adenocarcinoma resection.

Study design: We analyzed patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma from 2000 to 2012, at 7 US academic institutions. Patients with M1 disease or R2 resections were excluded. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank and Cox regression analyses.

Results: Of 742 patients, 257 (35%) had 7 to 15 LNs removed and 485 (65%) had ≥16 LNs removed. Disease-specific survival was not significantly longer after removal of ≥16 vs 7 to 15 LNs (10-year survival, 55% vs 47%, respectively; p = 0.53) for the entire cohort, but was significantly improved in the subset of patients with stage IA to IIIA (10-year survival, 74% vs 57%, respectively; p = 0.018) or N0-2 disease (72% vs 55%, respectively; p = 0.023). Similarly, for patients who were classified to more likely be "true N0-2," based on frequentist analysis incorporating both the number of positive and of total LNs removed, the hazard ratio for disease-related death (adjusted for T stage, R status, grade, receipt of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, and institution) significantly decreased as the number of LNs removed increased.

Conclusions: The number of LNs removed during gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma appears itself to have prognostic implications for long-term survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disease-specific survival curves for the entire study population based on the number of lymph nodes examined (continuous line: 16 or more lymph nodes, n = 485, 10-year DSS 55%; dashed line: 7–15 lymph nodes, n = 257, 10-year DSS 47%; P = 0.53).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Subset analysis of disease-specific survival curves after resection of gastric adenocarcinoma stratified by AJCC stage (7th edition). Although P values for all stages were > 0.05, patients who had 16 or more lymph nodes examined (continuous line) tended to have improved survival compared with patients who had 7–15 lymph nodes examined (dashed line) in Stages I-A through III-A, but not in stages III-B and III-C.
Figure 3
Figure 3
When stages I-A through III-A were combined together, patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who had 16 or more lymph nodes removed (continuous line, n = 269) had improved outcome after resection compared with patients who had 7–15 lymph nodes examined (dashed line, n = 229) with 10-year disease-specific survival rates of 74% versus 57% respectively (P = 0.018). This difference was not observed when stages III-B and III-C were analyzed together (P = 0.55).
Figure 4
Figure 4
When stages N0 through N2 were combined together, patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who had 16 or more lymph nodes examined (continuous line, n = 315) had improved outcome after resection compared with patients who had 7–15 lymph nodes examined (dashed line, n = 213) with 10-year disease-specific survival rates of 72% versus 55% respectively (P = 0.023). This difference was not observed in patients with N3 disease (P = 0.882).
Figure 5
Figure 5
A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to compute the Hazard Ratio (HR) for gastric cancer related death (black line, red lines illustrate 95% confidence interval) as a function of the total number of lymph nodes removed (Reference is 0 nodes removed). HR was adjusted for T stage, grade, margin status, receipt neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, and institution. On the left, when less advanced stage patients were analyzed (Ŝ0, more likely to be true N0-2, n = 676), the HR appears to decrease as the number of removed lymph nodes increases, but there does not appear to be an incremental benefit beyond 16 lymph nodes removed. On the right, when more advanced stage patients were analyzed (Ŝ1, more likely to be true N3, n = 163), no significant correlation between the HR and the number of lymph nodes removed was demonstrated.

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
    1. Maruyama K, Okabayashi K, Kinoshita T. Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality. World J Surg. 1987;11:418–425. - PubMed
    1. Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet. 1996;347:995–999. - PubMed
    1. Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, et al. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:1522–1530. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:908–914. - PubMed

Publication types