WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Response to Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines"
- PMID: 26206927
- DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa9892
WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Response to Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines"
Abstract
Ginther and Kahn claim that academics' beliefs about the importance of brilliance do not predict gender gaps in Ph.D. attainment beyond mathematics and verbal test scores. However, Ginther and Kahn's analyses are problematic, exhibiting more than 100 times the recommended collinearity thresholds. Multiple analyses that avoid this problem suggest that academics' beliefs are in fact uniquely predictive of gender gaps across academia.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Comment on
-
Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines.Science. 2015 Jan 16;347(6219):262-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1261375. Science. 2015. PMID: 25593183
-
WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines".Science. 2015 Jul 24;349(6246):391. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9632. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Science. 2015. PMID: 26206926
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
