2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group
- PMID: 26208232
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061
2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group
Abstract
Study design: Method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders.
Objective: To help authors design, conduct, and report systematic reviews of trials in this field.
Summary of background data: In 1997, the Cochrane Back Review Group editorial board published the Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews, which was updated in 2003 and in 2009. Since then, new methodological evidence has emerged and standards have changed, therefore it was clear that revisions were needed to the 2009 guideline. In May 2015 the group changed its name to Cochrane Back and Neck.
Methods: The editorial board met in September 2014 to review the relevant new methodological evidence and determine how it should be incorporated. Members of the advisory board were consulted. Based on the feedback received, an updated method guideline was prepared and approved by the editorial board.
Results: We have updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions. Each category is classified into minimum criteria (mandatory) and further guidance (optional). This update also includes some new guidance for preparation of summary of finding tables and for conducting nonintervention reviews.
Conclusion: Citations of previous versions of the method guideline in published scientific articles (1193 in total) suggest that others may find this guideline useful to plan, conduct, or evaluate systematic reviews in the field of back and neck pain, and spinal disorders.
Level of evidence: N/A.
Similar articles
-
2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1929-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19680101
-
Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1290-9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000065484.95996.AF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12811274
-
Updated method guidelines for cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews and metaanalyses.J Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;41(2):194-205. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121306. Epub 2013 Dec 1. J Rheumatol. 2014. PMID: 24293581
-
Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):280-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.658. Epub 2009 Nov 17. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 19920807 Review.
-
Inconsistent grading of evidence across countries: a review of low back pain guidelines.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Sep;29(7):576-81, 581.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.07.005. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006. PMID: 16949948 Review.
Cited by
-
Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? a systematic review.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249220. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33793608 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing changes in range of motion in adolescent patients undergoing myoActivation® for chronic pain related to myofascial dysfunction: a feasibility study.Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 25;4:1225088. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1225088. eCollection 2023. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37954067 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding a Player's Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.Sports (Basel). 2021 May 17;9(5):65. doi: 10.3390/sports9050065. Sports (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34067590 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Impact Research - how to choose experimental or observational intervention study?Ann Med. 2016 Nov;48(7):492-495. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1186828. Epub 2016 Aug 5. Ann Med. 2016. PMID: 27494394 Free PMC article.
-
Metabolic Surgery on Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 10;13:848947. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.848947. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35360056 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous