Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Aug;115(8):1299-307.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.04.019.

Implementation of Competitive Food and Beverage Standards in a Sample of Massachusetts Schools: The NOURISH Study (Nutrition Opportunities to Understand Reforms Involving Student Health)

Jessica A Hoffman, Lindsay Rosenfeld, Nicole Schmidt, Juliana F W Cohen, Mary Gorski, Ruth Chaffee, Lauren Smith, Eric B Rimm
Observational Study

Implementation of Competitive Food and Beverage Standards in a Sample of Massachusetts Schools: The NOURISH Study (Nutrition Opportunities to Understand Reforms Involving Student Health)

Jessica A Hoffman et al. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background: During 2012, Massachusetts adopted comprehensive school competitive food and beverage standards that closely align with Institute of Medicine recommendations and Smart Snacks in School national standards.

Objective: We examined the extent to which a sample of Massachusetts middle schools and high schools sold foods and beverages that were compliant with the state competitive food and beverage standards after the first year of implementation, and complied with four additional aspects of the regulations.

Design: Observational cohort study with data collected before implementation (Spring 2012) and 1 year after implementation (Spring 2013).

Participants/setting: School districts (N=37) with at least one middle school and one high school participated.

Main outcome measures: Percent of competitive foods and beverages that were compliant with Massachusetts standards and compliance with four additional aspects of the regulations. Data were collected via school site visits and a foodservice director questionnaire.

Statistical analyses performed: Multilevel models were used to examine change in food and beverage compliance over time.

Results: More products were available in high schools than middle schools at both time points. The number of competitive beverages and several categories of competitive food products sold in the sample of Massachusetts schools decreased following the implementation of the standards. Multilevel models demonstrated a 47-percentage-point increase in food and 46-percentage-point increase in beverage compliance in Massachusetts schools from 2012 to 2013. Overall, total compliance was higher for beverages than foods.

Conclusions: This study of a group of Massachusetts schools demonstrated the feasibility of schools making substantial changes in response to requirements for healthier competitive foods, even in the first year of implementation.

Keywords: Beverage; Competitive; Food; Lunch; School.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Statement Of Potential Conflict Of Interest: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
NOURISH (Nutrition Opportunities to Understand Reforms Involving Student Health) study Massachusetts school district recruitment procedures flow chart (N=37). aFRPL=free and reduced price lunch.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Average numbera of unique competitive foods and beverage products for sale in NOURISH (Nutrition Opportunities to Understand Reforms Involving Student Health) study Massachusetts middle schools before (Spring 2012) and after (Spring 2013) state competitive food and beverage standards went into effect. (B) Average numbera of unique competitive foods and beverage products for sale in NOURISH study Massachusetts high schools before (Spring 2012) and after (Spring 2013) state competitive food and beverage standards went into effect. aError bars represent standard errors.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Foods Sold in Competition with USDA School Meal Programs: A Report to Congress. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture; 2001.
    1. Greves HM, Rivara FP. Report card on school snack food policies among the United States' largest school districts in 2004-2005: Room for improvement. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brener N, O'Toole T, Kann L, Lowry R, Wechsler H. Availability of less nutritious snack foods and beverages in secondary schools–selected states, 2002-2008. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:1–4. early release. - PubMed
    1. Kann L, Grunbaum JA, McKenna ML, Wechsler H, Galuska DA. Competitive foods and beverages available for purchase in secondary schools–selected sites, United States, 2004. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(37):917–921. - PubMed
    1. Fox M, Gordon A, Nogales R, Wilson A. Availability and consumption of competitive foods in US public schools. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(2 suppl):S57–S66. - PubMed

Publication types