Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S245-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.024.

Enteral Nutrition for Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury in the Rehabilitation Setting: Associations With Patient Preinjury and Injury Characteristics and Outcomes

Affiliations
Observational Study

Enteral Nutrition for Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury in the Rehabilitation Setting: Associations With Patient Preinjury and Injury Characteristics and Outcomes

Susan D Horn et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association of enteral nutrition (EN) with patient preinjury and injury characteristics and outcomes for patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Nine rehabilitation centers.

Participants: Patients (N=1701) admitted for first full inpatient rehabilitation after TBI.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: FIM at rehabilitation discharge, length of stay, weight loss, and various infections.

Results: There were many significant differences in preinjury and injury characteristics between patients who received EN and patients who did not. After matching patients with a propensity score of >40% for the likely use of EN, patients receiving EN with either a standard or a high-protein formula (>20% of calories coming from protein) for >25% of their rehabilitation stay had higher FIM motor and cognitive scores at rehabilitation discharge and less weight loss than did patients with similar characteristics not receiving EN.

Conclusions: For patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after TBI and matched on a propensity score of >40% for the likely use of EN, clinicians should strongly consider, when possible, EN for ≥25% of the rehabilitation stay and especially with a formula that contains at least 20% protein rather than a standard formula.

Keywords: Brain injuries; Comparative effectiveness research; Enteral nutrition; Propensity score; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rapp RP, Young B, Twyman D, et al. The favorable effect of early parenteral feeding on survival in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg. 1983;58:906–912. - PubMed
    1. Taylor SJ, Fettes SB, Jewkes C, Nelson RJ. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial to determine the effect of early enhanced enteral nutrition on clinical outcome in mechanically ventilated patients suffering head injury. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:2525–2531. - PubMed
    1. Doig GS, Heighes PT, Simpson F, Sweetman EA. Early enteral nutrition reduces mortality in trauma patients requiring intensive care: a metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Injury. 2011;42:50–Y56. - PubMed
    1. Pepe JL, Barba CA. The metabolic response to acute traumatic brain injury and implications for nutritional support. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(5):462–74. - PubMed
    1. Bistrian BR, Askew W, Erdman JW, Oria MP. Nutrition and traumatic brain injury: a perspective from the Institute of Medicine. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35:556–559. - PubMed

Publication types