Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec;42(12):926-41.
doi: 10.1111/joor.12336. Epub 2015 Jul 25.

Perspectives on next steps in classification of oro-facial pain - part 1: role of ontology

Affiliations
Review

Perspectives on next steps in classification of oro-facial pain - part 1: role of ontology

W Ceusters et al. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review existing principles of oro-facial pain classifications and to specify design recommendations for a new system that would reflect recent insights in biomedical classification systems, terminologies and ontologies. The study was initiated by a symposium organised by the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network in March 2013, to which the present authors contributed. The following areas are addressed: problems with current classification approaches, status of the ontological basis of pain disorders, insufficient diagnostic aids and biomarkers for pain disorders, exploratory nature of current pain terminology and classification systems, and problems with prevailing classification methods from an ontological perspective. Four recommendations for addressing these problems are as follows: (i) develop a hypothesis-driven classification structure built on principles that ensure to our best understanding an accurate description of the relations among all entities involved in oro-facial pain disorders; (ii) take into account the physiology and phenomenology of oro-facial pain disorders to adequately represent both domains including psychosocial entities in a classification system; (iii) plan at the beginning for field-testing at strategic development stages; and (iv) consider how the classification system will be implemented. Implications in relation to the specific domains of psychosocial factors and biomarkers for inclusion into an oro-facial pain classification system are described in two separate papers.

Keywords: DC/TMD; chronic oro-facial pain; classification; ontology; temporomandibular disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest with the present work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Renton T, Durham J, Aggarwal VR. The classification and differential diagnosis of orofacial pain. Expert review of neurotherapeutics. 2012;12(5):569–576. - PubMed
    1. Ohrbach R. Temporomandibular Disorders: Conceptualization and Diagnostic Frameworks. Alpha Omegan. 2003;96:15–19. - PubMed
    1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992;6(4):301–355. - PubMed
    1. Garofalo JP, Wesley L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Reflection of the Physical-Psychological Interface. APS Bulletin. 1997 May-Jun;:4–8.
    1. Clark GT, Delcanho RE, Goulet J-P. The utility and validity of current diagnostic procedures for defining tempormandibular disorder patients. Advances in Dental Research. 1993;7:97–112. - PubMed

Publication types