Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;9 Suppl(0):21-32.
doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0017.

The National Cancer Institute's Community Networks Program Initiative to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities: Outcomes and Lessons Learned

Kathryn L Braun, Susan Stewart, Claudia Baquet, Lisa Berry-Bobovski, Daniel Blumenthal, Heather M Brandt, Dedra S Buchwald, Janis E Campbell, Kathryn Coe, Leslie C Cooper, Paula Espinoza, Ronda Henry-Tillman, Margaret Hargreaves, Aimee James, Judith Salmon Kaur, K Viswanath, Grace X Ma, Jeanne Mandelblatt, Cathy Meade, Amelie Ramirez, Isabel Scarinci, Sora Park Tanjasiri, Beti Thompson, Anissa I Vines, Mark Dignan

The National Cancer Institute's Community Networks Program Initiative to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities: Outcomes and Lessons Learned

Kathryn L Braun et al. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015.

Abstract

Background: We describe reach, partnerships, products, benefits, and lessons learned of the 25 Community Network Programs (CNPs) that applied community-based participatory research (CBPR) to reduce cancer health disparities.

Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were abstracted from CNP final reports. Qualitative data were grouped by theme.

Results: Together, the 25 CNPs worked with more than 2,000 academic, clinical, community, government, faith-based, and other partners. They completed 211 needs assessments, leveraged funds for 328 research and service projects, trained 719 new investigators, educated almost 55,000 community members, and published 991 articles. Qualitative data illustrated how use of CBPR improved research methods and participation; improved knowledge, interventions, and outcomes; and built community capacity. Lessons learned related to the need for time to nurture partnerships and the need to attend to community demand for sustained improvements in cancer services.

Implications: Findings demonstrate the value of government-supported, community-academic, CBPR partnerships in cancer prevention and control research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(1):9–29. - PubMed
    1. Chu KC, Chen MS, Jr, Dignan M, Taylor E, Partridge E, CNP PIs Parallels between the development of therapeutic drugs and cancer health disparities programs. Cancer. 2008;113:2790–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . HHS action plan to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities: a nation free of disparities in health and health care. Author; Washington (DC): 2011.
    1. Jackson FE, Chu KC, Garcia R. Special Populations Networks: How this innovative community-based initiative affected minority and underserved research programs. Cancer. 2006;107(Suppl 8):1939–44. - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Community Networks to reduce cancer health disparities (NIH Guide April 26, 2004) (RFA: CA–05–012) Author; Bethesda (MD): 2005. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-CA–05–012.html.

Publication types

MeSH terms