Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome
- PMID: 26213622
- PMCID: PMC4500453
- DOI: 10.1179/205057113X13782848890774
Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome
Abstract
This present study examined the relationship between cognitive measures and self-report hearing aid outcome. A sentence-final word identification and recall (SWIR) test was used to investigate how hearing aid use may relate to experienced explicit cognitive processing. A visually based cognitive test battery was also administered. To measure self-report hearing aid outcome, the International Outcome Inventory - Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) were employed. Twenty-six experienced hearing aid users (mean age of 59 years) with symmetrical moderate-to-moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss were recruited. Free recall performance in the SWIR test correlated negatively with item 3 of IOI-HA, which measures residual difficulty in adverse listening situations. Cognitive abilities related to verbal information processing were correlated positively with self-reported hearing aid use and overall success. The present study showed that reported residual difficulty with hearing aid may relate to experienced explicit processing in difficult listening conditions, such that individuals with better cognitive capacity tended to report more remaining difficulty in challenging listening situations. The possibility of using cognitive measures to predict hearing aid outcome in real life should be explored in future research.
Keywords: Cognitive abilities; Hearing aid; Outcome measures; Self-reported; Working memory.
Similar articles
-
Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):215-225. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000481. Ear Hear. 2018. PMID: 28806193 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.Ear Hear. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;42(6):1668-1679. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001053. Ear Hear. 2021. PMID: 33859121 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):15-28. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182617f94. Ear Hear. 2013. PMID: 22941406
-
Cognitive Spare Capacity as an Index of Listening Effort.Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:69S-76S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000302. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 27355773 Review.
-
Chapter 2: My Hearing Aid Isn't Working Like It Used to….Semin Hear. 2024 May 17;45(2):153-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786523. eCollection 2024 May. Semin Hear. 2024. PMID: 38855342 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Hearing aid fitting in older persons with hearing impairment: the influence of cognitive function, age, and hearing loss on hearing aid benefit.Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Feb 10;10:435-43. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S77096. eCollection 2015. Clin Interv Aging. 2015. PMID: 25709417 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.Int J Audiol. 2016 Nov;55(11):623-42. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1219775. Epub 2016 Sep 2. Int J Audiol. 2016. PMID: 27589015 Free PMC article.
-
Listening to speech-in-noise with hearing aids: Do the self-reported outcomes reflect the behavioral speech perception task performance?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar;281(3):1139-1147. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08193-5. Epub 2023 Aug 26. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 37632542
-
Cognitive processing load during listening is reduced more by decreasing voice similarity than by increasing spatial separation between target and masker speech.Front Neurosci. 2014 Apr 29;8:88. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00088. eCollection 2014. Front Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24808818 Free PMC article.
-
Listen Carefully protocol: an exploratory case-control study of the association between listening effort and cognitive function.BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e051109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051109. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35264340 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Akeroyd M.A. 2008. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology, 47Suppl. 2: S53–S71. - PubMed
-
- Baddeley A.D., Logie R., Nimmo-Smith I. 1985. Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24: 119–131.
-
- Baddeley A.D., Wilson B.A. 1985. Phonological coding and short term memory in patients without speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 24: 490–502.
-
- Boldt J.B., Kjems U., Pedersen M.S., Lunner T., Wang D. (2008, 14–17 September) Estimation of the ideal binary mask using directional systems. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Acoustic Echo and Noise Control, URL (consulted April, 2013). Available from: http://www.iwaenc.org/proceedings/2008/contents/papers/9062.pdf.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources