Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;16(4):197-207.
doi: 10.1179/205057113X13782848890774.

Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome

Affiliations

Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome

Elaine Hoi Ning Ng et al. Speech Lang Hear. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

This present study examined the relationship between cognitive measures and self-report hearing aid outcome. A sentence-final word identification and recall (SWIR) test was used to investigate how hearing aid use may relate to experienced explicit cognitive processing. A visually based cognitive test battery was also administered. To measure self-report hearing aid outcome, the International Outcome Inventory - Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) were employed. Twenty-six experienced hearing aid users (mean age of 59 years) with symmetrical moderate-to-moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss were recruited. Free recall performance in the SWIR test correlated negatively with item 3 of IOI-HA, which measures residual difficulty in adverse listening situations. Cognitive abilities related to verbal information processing were correlated positively with self-reported hearing aid use and overall success. The present study showed that reported residual difficulty with hearing aid may relate to experienced explicit processing in difficult listening conditions, such that individuals with better cognitive capacity tended to report more remaining difficulty in challenging listening situations. The possibility of using cognitive measures to predict hearing aid outcome in real life should be explored in future research.

Keywords: Cognitive abilities; Hearing aid; Outcome measures; Self-reported; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akeroyd M.A. 2008. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology, 47Suppl. 2: S53–S71. - PubMed
    1. Arehart K.H., Souza P., Baca R., Kates J.M. 2013. Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion. Ear and Hearing, 34(3): 251–260. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318271aa5e. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A.D., Logie R., Nimmo-Smith I. 1985. Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24: 119–131.
    1. Baddeley A.D., Wilson B.A. 1985. Phonological coding and short term memory in patients without speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 24: 490–502.
    1. Boldt J.B., Kjems U., Pedersen M.S., Lunner T., Wang D. (2008, 14–17 September) Estimation of the ideal binary mask using directional systems. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Acoustic Echo and Noise Control, URL (consulted April, 2013). Available from: http://www.iwaenc.org/proceedings/2008/contents/papers/9062.pdf.

LinkOut - more resources