Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;3(3):163-8.

Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement

Affiliations

Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement

Fatih Küçükdurmaz et al. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The Internet has become the most widely-used source for patients seeking information more about their health and many sites geared towards this audience have gained widespread use in recent years. Additionally, many healthcare institutions publish their own patient-education web sites with information regarding common conditions. Little is known about how these resources impact patient health, though, as they have the potential both to inform and to misinform patients regarding their prognosis and possible treatments. In this study we investigated the reliability, readability and quality of information about femoracetabular impingement, a condition which commonly affects young patients.

Methods: The terms "hip impingement" and "femoracetabular impingement" were searched in Google® in November 2013 and the first 30 results were analyzed. The LIDA scale was used to assess website accessibility, usability and reliability. The DISCERN scale was used to assess reliability and quality of information. The FRE score was used to assess readability.

Results: The patient-oriented sites performed significantly worse in LIDA reliability, and DISCERN reliability. However, the FRE score was significantly higher in patient-oriented sites.

Conclusion: According to our results, the websites intended to attract patients searching for information regarding femoroacetabular impingement are providing a highly accessible, readable information source, but do not appear to apply a comparable amount of rigor to scientific literature or healthcare practitioner websites in regard to matters such as citing sources for information, supplying methodology and including a publication date. This indicates that while these resources are easily accessed by patients, there is potential for them to be a source of misinformation.

Keywords: Hip; Impingement; Internet; Medical information; Reliability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of times participants clicked on a search result by rank order of the link as it appeared in list of search results. By Eysenbach G, Köhler C, used with permission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of the total score of patient oriented sites and physician oriented sites, for LIDA reliability (LIDA relie), the supplement of LIDA, DISCERN reliability (DISCERN relie), and Flesch Reading Ease (FK read score).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation of LIDA and DISCERN analyses for reliability of patient-oriented and practitioner-oriented web pages.

References

    1. Küçükdurmaz F, Aytekin M, Tuncay I, Sen C. A Pilot Study About Quality Of Information at Health Related Web Sites in Turkish: Meniscus Tear. Nobel Med. 2013;9(2):114–7.
    1. Smarrito S, Mitrofanoff M, Haddad R, Pavy B. Do we need a chart of quality for websites related to cosmetic surgery? Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2003;48(4):222–7. - PubMed
    1. Kishimoto K, Yoshino C, Fukushima N. Study of the health food information for cancer patients on Japanese websites. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2010;130(8):1017–27. - PubMed
    1. Neumark Y, Flum L, Lopez-Quintero C, Shtarkshall R. Quality of online health information about oral contraceptives from Hebrew-language websites. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1(1):38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;287(20):2691–700. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources