Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;136(2):e378-85.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3783.

Variation in Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in Infants

Affiliations

Variation in Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in Infants

Michael D Quartermain et al. Pediatrics. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background and objective: Prenatal diagnosis allows improved perioperative outcomes for fetuses with certain forms of congenital heart disease (CHD). Variability in prenatal diagnosis has been demonstrated in other countries, leading to efforts to improve fetal imaging protocols and access to care, but has not been examined across the United States. The objective was to evaluate national variation in prenatal detection across geographic region and defect type in neonates and infants with CHD undergoing heart surgery.

Methods: Cardiovascular operations performed in patients ≤6 months of age in the United States and included in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (2006-2012) were eligible for inclusion. Centers with >15% missing prenatal diagnosis data were excluded from the study. Prenatal diagnosis rates were compared across geographic location of residence and defect type using the χ(2) test.

Results: Overall, the study included 31,374 patients from 91 Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database participating centers across the United States. Prenatal detection occurred in 34% and increased every year, from 26% (2006) to 42% (2012). There was significant geographic variation in rates of prenatal diagnosis across states (range 11.8%-53.4%, P < .0001). Significant variability by defect type was also observed, with higher rates for lesions identifiable on 4-chamber view than for those requiring outflow tract visualization (57% vs 32%, P < .0001).

Conclusions: Rates of prenatal CHD detection in the United States remain low for patients undergoing surgical intervention, with significant variability between states and across defect type. Additional studies are needed to identify reasons for this variation and the potential impact on patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr Pasquali receives support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grant K08HL103631). Dr Hill receives support from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (grant UL1TR001117). The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1. PDRs by year for neonatal (white bars) and infant (black bars) cohorts. N indicates the total number of subjects represented by each bar.
FIGURE 1
PDRs by year for neonatal (white bars) and infant (black bars) cohorts. N indicates the total number of subjects represented by each bar.
FIGURE 2. PDRs are demonstrated by defect visibility on 4CV (No/Yes). AV, atrioventricular; CC-TGA, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; TGA/IVS, transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum. Single-ventricle lesions include HLHS.
FIGURE 2
PDRs are demonstrated by defect visibility on 4CV (No/Yes). AV, atrioventricular; CC-TGA, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; TGA/IVS, transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum. Single-ventricle lesions include HLHS.
FIGURE 3. The 10 USDHHS regions, with PDRs. Oregon, Nevada, and Utah did not have sufficient prenatal diagnosis data during study period to be included in the analysis.
FIGURE 3
The 10 USDHHS regions, with PDRs. Oregon, Nevada, and Utah did not have sufficient prenatal diagnosis data during study period to be included in the analysis.
FIGURE 4. PDRs by state. States in black (Oregon, Nevada, and Utah) did not have sufficient prenatal diagnosis data during study period to be included in the analysis.
FIGURE 4
PDRs by state. States in black (Oregon, Nevada, and Utah) did not have sufficient prenatal diagnosis data during study period to be included in the analysis.

References

    1. Ferencz C , Rubin JD , McCarter RJ , et al. Congenital heart disease: prevalence at livebirth. The Baltimore–Washington Infant Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121(1):31–36 - PubMed
    1. Hoffman JI . Incidence of congenital heart disease: II. Prenatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol. 1995;16(4):155–165 - PubMed
    1. Talner CN . Report of the New England Regional Infant Cardiac Program, by Donald C. Fyler, MD, Pediatrics, 1980;65(suppl):375–461. Pediatrics. 1998;102(1 pt 2):258–259 - PubMed
    1. Tworetzky W , McElhinney DB , Reddy VM , Brook MM , Hanley FL , Silverman NH . Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation. 2001;103(9):1269–1273 - PubMed
    1. Bonnet D , Coltri A , Butera G , et al. Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation. 1999;99(7):916–918 - PubMed

Publication types