Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 18:2:16.
doi: 10.1186/s40608-015-0044-6. eCollection 2015.

Prevalence of obesity and overweight, its clinical markers and associated factors in a high risk South-Asian population

Affiliations

Prevalence of obesity and overweight, its clinical markers and associated factors in a high risk South-Asian population

Faridah Amin et al. BMC Obes. .

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a global epidemic, which is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and metabolic abnormalities. It is measured by body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), body fat (BF) distribution and abdominal fat mass, each having its own merits and limitations. Variability in body composition between ethnic groups in South-Asians is significant and may not be truly reflected by BMI alone, which may result in misclassification. This study therefore, aims to determine the frequency of obesity, body fat composition and distribution, in a high risk population of an urban slum of Karachi, Pakistan. This survey included 451 participants selected by systematic sampling who were administered pre-tested questionnaires on socio-demographics, diet and physical activity. Chi-square was used to determine the association between categorical variables and multiple linear regression was used for quantitative variables. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Classified by BMI, 29% study subjects were overweight and 21% obese (58.7% with central obesity). Body fat percent (BF%) classified 81% as overweight. Females were more obese (P 0.03) with higher prevalence of central obesity (P <0.001) and WHR (P 0.003) but with a lower muscle mass (P 0.001). Activity score and muscle mass showed inverse linear association with BF% whereas, WC, weight, BMI and WHR had a positive linear association with BF%. The relationship between BMI and BF% was quadratic with a weaker association at lower BMI. Adjusting for socio-demographic variables, BF%, weight, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), BMI and score on the diet questionnaire had a positive linear association with WC, while WC, WHR and BP had a positive linear association with BF%. BF%, muscle content and WC had a positive linear association with BMI.

Conclusion: Considering lower cut-offs for South-Asians BMI and WC, this study showed a high prevalence of obesity among a sub-urban population of Karachi, which was even higher when BF% was measured. Considering the rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases, BF%, WC, WHR and BMI measurements are convenient and feasible means of identifying population at risk and hence addressing it through public awareness and early detection.

Keywords: Body fat percentage; Body mass index; Obesity; Waist circumference; Waist-hip ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Association of activity score with body fat percentage. (P 0.03) (pearson correlation co-efficient r = −0.18).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association of body muscle content with body fat percentage. (P <0.001) (spearman correlation co-efficient rs = −0.53).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association of waist circumference with body fat percentage. (P <0.001) (spearman correlation co-efficient rs = 0.65).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association of weight with body fat percentage. (P <0.001), (spearman correlation co-efficient rs =0.51).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Association of waist-hip ratio with body fat percentage. (P <0.001 spearman correlation co-efficient rs = 0.31).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Association of body mass index with body fat percentage. P <0.001, spearman correlation co-efficient rs = 0.74).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sowers JR. Obesity as a cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Med. 2003;115(Suppl 8A):37S–41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.08.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hossain P, Kawar B, El Nahas M. Obesity and diabetes in the developing world–a growing challenge. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):213–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068177. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Kelley DE, Leibel RL, Nonas C, et al. Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from shaping america’s health: association for weight management and obesity prevention; NAASO, the Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association. Obesity. 2007;15(5):1061–7. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.632. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz G, Liu S, Solomon CG, et al. Diet, lifestyle, and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(11):790–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Srikanthan P, Karlamangla AS. Relative muscle mass is inversely associated with insulin resistance and prediabetes. Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(9):2898–903. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0435. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources