Consensus for the Treatment of Varicose Vein with Radiofrequency Ablation
- PMID: 26217628
- PMCID: PMC4480318
- DOI: 10.5758/vsi.2014.30.4.105
Consensus for the Treatment of Varicose Vein with Radiofrequency Ablation
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to introduce the schematic protocol of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of varicose veins.
Indication: anatomic or pathophysiologic indication includes venous diameter within 2-20 mm, reflux time ≥0.5 seconds and distance from the skin ≥5 mm or subfascial location. Access: it is recommended to access at or above the knee joint for great saphenous vein and above the mid-calf for small saphenous vein. Catheter placement: the catheter tip should be placed 2.0 cm inferior to the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis ≥class III should be treated with low-molecular weight heparin. Tumescent solution: the composition of solution can be variable (e.g., 2% lidocaine 20 mL+500 mL normal saline+bicarbonate 2.5 mL with/without epinephrine). Infiltration can be done from each direction. Ablation: two cycles' ablation for the first proximal segment of saphenous vein and the segment with the incompetent perforators is recommended. The other segments should be ablated one time. During RF energy delivery, it is recommended to apply external compression. Concomitant procedure: It is recommended to do simultaneously ambulatory phlebectomy. For sclerotherapy, it is recommended to defer at least 2 weeks. Post-procedural management: post-procedural ambulation is encouraged to reduce the thrombotic complications. Compression stocking should be applied for at least 7 days. Minor daily activity is not limited, but strenuous activities should be avoided for 2 weeks. It is suggested to take showers after 24 hours and tub baths, swimming, or soaking in water after 2 weeks.
Keywords: Ablation; Consensus; Radiofrequency; Varicose veins.
Similar articles
-
Reflux in the below-knee great saphenous vein can be safely treated with endovenous ablation.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014 Oct;2(4):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 May 24. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014. PMID: 26993545
-
Endovenous ablation with concomitant phlebectomy is a safe and effective method of treatment for symptomatic patients with axial reflux and large incompetent tributaries.J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.054. Epub 2013 Apr 6. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23571079
-
Short Term Fate of Great Saphenous Vein after Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Veins.Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2015 Jul-Sep;13(51):234-7. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v13i3.16814. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2015. PMID: 27180370
-
Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? Review.Vascular. 2016 Dec;24(6):649-657. doi: 10.1177/1708538116648035. Epub 2016 Apr 28. Vascular. 2016. PMID: 27126643 Review.
-
Endovenous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of varicose veins.Vascular. 2007 Sep-Oct;15(5):255-61. doi: 10.2310/6670.2007.00062. Vascular. 2007. PMID: 17976324 Review.
Cited by
-
Vein Size and Disease Severity in Chronic Venous Diseases.Int J Angiol. 2018 Dec;27(4):185-189. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639355. Epub 2018 Apr 6. Int J Angiol. 2018. PMID: 30410288 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of saphenous vein diameter and reflux time on stump length after cyanoacrylate closure.Exp Ther Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):1845-1849. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7758. Epub 2019 Jul 9. Exp Ther Med. 2019. PMID: 31410146 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes of nonthermal ablation, thermal ablation, and surgical stripping for varicose veins.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Nov;12(6):101902. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101902. Epub 2024 May 15. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024. PMID: 38754778 Free PMC article.
-
Interesting Scenarios during Radiofrequency Ablation of Varicose Veins at University Hospital of Nepal.Int J Vasc Med. 2020 Nov 12;2020:2035494. doi: 10.1155/2020/2035494. eCollection 2020. Int J Vasc Med. 2020. PMID: 33274078 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and complete saphenous vein stripping in patients with mild to moderate chronic venous disease with a 3-year follow-up.Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019 May 2;17(2):eAO4526. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4526. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019. PMID: 31066792 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Jones RT, Kabnick LS. Perioperative duplex ultrasound following endothermal ablation of the saphenous vein: is it worthless? J Invasive Cardiol. 2014;26:548–550. - PubMed
-
- Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, Kistner RL, Pichot O, et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study) J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:207–214. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00228-3. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, Kistner RL, Pichot O, et al. Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.09.019. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Goode SD, Chowdhury A, Crockett M, Beech A, Simpson R, Richards T, et al. Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm) Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.026. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources