Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):365-72.

Sympathetic Block as a New Treatment for Lymphedema

Affiliations
  • PMID: 26218940
Free article

Sympathetic Block as a New Treatment for Lymphedema

Eunjoo Choi et al. Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) not only has physical implications, but also affects the quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Despite numerous studies of various therapies, the optimal treatment for BCRL is unknown.

Objective: In this study, we investigated the efficacy of sympathetic blockade (thoracic sympathetic ganglion block, [TSGB]) in treating BCRL.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center/teaching hospital.

Methods: TSGB was performed in 35 patients under fluoroscopic guidance. First, arm circumference and Lymphedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire [LBCQ] score were assessed before TSGB and 2 weeks and 2 months after the procedure. Efficacy was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in the LBCQ score and a ≥ 50% decrease in the circumference difference between the unaffected and affected arms 2 months after TSGB. Second, TSGB efficacy according to the lymphedema stage and the period between BCRL onset and TSGB (< 6 months vs. > 6 months) was evaluated.

Results: The arm circumference and LBCQ score significantly decreased at 2 months (P < 0.001), and 65.7% of patients showed good efficacy. Patients with high stage lymphedema showed improved efficacy after TSGB compared to those with low stage disease (P = 0.045). The TSGB efficacy did not differ according to the period between BCRL onset and TSGB.

Limitations: This study was not a randomized prospective controlled study and did not compare the therapeutic outcomes to those in a conservative treatment group.

Conclusions: TSGB in BCRL patients appears to be effective in decreasing the affected arm circumference. TSGB may be an alternative option in BCRL patients who do not respond to conservative therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by