Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial)
- PMID: 26219670
- PMCID: PMC4518687
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1551-z
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial)
Abstract
Background: For gastric cancer patients, surgical resection with en-bloc lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of curative treatment. Open gastrectomy has long been the preferred surgical approach worldwide. However, this procedure is associated with considerable morbidity. Several meta-analyses have shown an advantage in short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy compared to open procedures, with similar oncologic outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether the results of these Asian studies can be extrapolated to the Western population. In this trial from the Netherlands, patients with resectable gastric cancer will be randomized to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy.
Methods: The study is a non-blinded, multicenter, prospectively randomized controlled superiority trial. Patients (≥18 years) with histologically proven, surgically resectable (cT1-4a, N0-3b, M0) gastric adenocarcinoma and European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 are eligible to participate in the study after obtaining informed consent. Patients (n = 210) will be included in one of the ten participating Dutch centers and are randomized to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. The primary outcome is postoperative hospital stay (days). Secondary outcome parameters include postoperative morbidity and mortality, oncologic outcomes, readmissions, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.
Discussion: In this randomized controlled trial laparoscopic and open gastrectomy are compared in patients with resectable gastric cancer. It is expected that laparoscopic gastrectomy will result in a faster recovery of the patient and a shorter hospital stay. Secondly, it is expected that laparoscopic gastrectomy will be associated with a lower postoperative morbidity, less readmissions, higher cost-effectiveness, better postoperative quality of life, but with similar mortality and oncologic outcomes, compared to open gastrectomy. The study started on 1 December 2014. Inclusion and follow-up will take 3 and 5 years respectively. Short-term results will be analyzed and published after discharge of the last randomized patient.
Trial registration: NCT02248519.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).Trials. 2012 Nov 30;13:230. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-230. Trials. 2012. PMID: 23199187 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision, D2 + CME) with conventional D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2018 Aug 9;19(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2790-5. Trials. 2018. PMID: 30092843 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 20;39(9):978-989. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01540. Epub 2021 Jan 6. J Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34581617 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5694-717. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5694. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27433084 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Dig Surg. 2013;30(2):132-41. doi: 10.1159/000350884. Epub 2013 Jul 18. Dig Surg. 2013. PMID: 23867590 Review.
Cited by
-
The 140 years' journey of gastric cancer surgery: From the two hands of Billroth to the multiple hands of the robot.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Feb 12;5(3):270-277. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12442. eCollection 2021 May. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021. PMID: 34095716 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer : Operative and postoperative results].Chirurg. 2020 Mar;91(3):252-261. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-01053-1. Chirurg. 2020. PMID: 31654103 German.
-
Laparoscopic for advanced gastric cancer-minimally invasive for maximal results?Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan 25;7:13. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.02.09. eCollection 2022. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 35243122 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011389. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011389.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27030300 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765).BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e064286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064286. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36316075 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. - PubMed
-
- Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, Bonenkamp JJ, Klein Kranenbarg E, Songun I, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2069–77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.026. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials