Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul 28;5(7):e008369.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008369.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial

Mohit Arora et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pressure ulcers are a common and severe complication of spinal cord injury, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries where people often need to manage pressure ulcers alone and at home. Telephone-based support may help people in these situations to manage their pressure ulcers. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support to help people with spinal cord injury manage pressure ulcers at home in India and Bangladesh.

Methods and analysis: A multicentre (3 sites), prospective, assessor-blinded, parallel, randomised controlled trial will be undertaken. 120 participants with pressure ulcers on the sacrum, ischial tuberosity or greater trochanter of the femur secondary to spinal cord injury will be randomly assigned to a Control or Intervention group. Participants in the Control group will receive usual community care. That is, they will manage their pressure ulcers on their own at home but will be free to access whatever healthcare support they can. Participants in the Intervention group will also manage their pressure ulcers at home and will also be free to access whatever healthcare support they can, but in addition they will receive weekly telephone-based support and advice for 12 weeks (15-25 min/week). The primary outcome is the size of the pressure ulcer at 12 weeks. 13 secondary outcomes will be measured reflecting other aspects of pressure ulcer resolution, depression, quality of life, participation and satisfaction with healthcare provision. An economic evaluation will be run in parallel and will include a cost-effectiveness and a cost-utility analysis.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee at each site. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications and presented at national and international conferences.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12613001225707.

Keywords: HEALTH ECONOMICS; Telemedicine < BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOINFORMATICS; WOUND MANAGEMENT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time schedule of enrolment, intervention, assessments, participants’ visit and phone contacts during the study.

References

    1. Kovindha A, Kammuang-Lue P, Prakongsai P et al. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Thai wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 2015. [epub ahead of print 5 May 2015]. doi:10.1038/sc.2015.77 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health care professionals. Washington DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America, 2014. - PubMed
    1. Allman RM. Epidemiology of pressure sores in different populations. Decubitus 1989;2:30–3. - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez GP, Garber SL. Prospective study of pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1994;32:150–8. 10.1038/sc.1994.28 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Byrne DW, Salzberg CA. Major risk factors for pressure ulcers in the spinal cord disabled: a literature review. Spinal Cord 1996;34:255–63. 10.1038/sc.1996.46 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources