Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;7(2):242-6.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00475.1.

Can Tablet Computers Enhance Faculty Teaching?

Aditee P Narayan, Shari A Whicker, Robert W Benjamin, Jeffrey Hawley, Kathleen A McGann

Can Tablet Computers Enhance Faculty Teaching?

Aditee P Narayan et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Learner benefits of tablet computer use have been demonstrated, yet there is little evidence regarding faculty tablet use for teaching.

Objective: Our study sought to determine if supplying faculty with tablet computers and peer mentoring provided benefits to learners and faculty beyond that of non-tablet-based teaching modalities.

Methods: We provided faculty with tablet computers and three 2-hour peer-mentoring workshops on tablet-based teaching. Faculty used tablets to teach, in addition to their current, non-tablet-based methods. Presurveys, postsurveys, and monthly faculty surveys assessed feasibility, utilization, and comparisons to current modalities. Learner surveys assessed perceived effectiveness and comparisons to current modalities. All feedback received from open-ended questions was reviewed by the authors and organized into categories.

Results: Of 15 eligible faculty, 14 participated. Each participant attended at least 2 of the 3 workshops, with 10 to 12 participants at each workshop. All participants found the workshops useful, and reported that the new tablet-based teaching modality added value beyond that of current teaching methods. Respondents developed the following tablet-based outputs: presentations, photo galleries, evaluation tools, and online modules. Of the outputs, 60% were used in the ambulatory clinics, 33% in intensive care unit bedside teaching rounds, and 7% in inpatient medical unit bedside teaching rounds. Learners reported that common benefits of tablet computers were: improved access/convenience (41%), improved interactive learning (38%), and improved bedside teaching and patient care (13%). A common barrier faculty identified was inconsistent wireless access (14%), while no barriers were identified by the majority of learners.

Conclusions: Providing faculty with tablet computers and having peer-mentoring workshops to discuss their use was feasible and added value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Number of New Outputs Generated by Faculty (in Aggregate) Over Time a Denotes peer-mentoring session months. Initial orientation was held in September 2012.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Learner Preference for Tablet-Based Teaching Outputs Compared to Current Non–Tablet-Based Platform Note: Learners reported value only on the outputs with which they were taught.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Franko O, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst. 2012;36(5):3135–3139. - PubMed
    1. Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T. 2014;39(5):356–364. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook DJ, Moradkhani A, Doublas KS, Prinsen SK, Fischer EN, Schroeder DR. Patient education self-management during surgical recovery: combining mobile (iPad) and a content management system. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(4):312–317. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marcano Belisario JS, Huckvale K, Greenfield G, Car J, Gunn LH. Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD010013. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cummings A, Parker CD, Kwapniowski LA, Reynolds G. Using mobility technology to improve pharmacist workflow in the PICU rounding process. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2008;22(4):39–43. - PubMed