The Ultrasound-Guided Retroclavicular Block: A Prospective Feasibility Study
- PMID: 26222346
- DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000284
The Ultrasound-Guided Retroclavicular Block: A Prospective Feasibility Study
Abstract
Background and objectives: The aim of this feasibility study was to determine the success rate (sensory and surgical) of the novel retroclavicular block and to thoroughly describe the technique. In addition, needle tip and shaft visibility, needling time, procedural discomfort, motor block success rate, patient satisfaction at 48-hour follow-up, and complications were also recorded.
Methods: Fifty patients scheduled for distal upper limb surgery received an in-plane, single-shot, ultrasound-guided retroclavicular block with 40 mL of mepivacaine 1.5% with epinephrine 2.5 μg/mL. Block success was defined as a sensory score of 10/10 for the 5 nerves supplying the distal upper limb at 30 minutes. Surgical success, needle visibility, needling time, axillary artery depth, motor block rate, patient discomfort with technique, satisfaction at 48 hours, and complications were also recorded. All blocks were video-recorded and timed for further independent assessment. A chest x-ray was obtained before discharge.
Results: Forty-five patients had a total sensory score of 10/10 at 30 minutes (90% success rate). Surgical success rate was 96%. Mean needling time was 3.77 minutes (25th-75th percentiles, 2.90-6.53 minutes) with a mean axillary artery depth of 3.1 ± 0.7 cm. Procedure-related discomfort (mean visual analog scale, 1.9 ± 1.2) was low. Mean 48-hour patient satisfaction rate (9.2 ± 1.1), mean needle tip (Likert scale, 3.0 ± 0.9), and shaft visibility (3.9 ± 0.9) were high. One vascular puncture and two transient paresthesias were recorded. No pneumothorax was revealed by chest x-ray.
Conclusions: In this study, the novel retroclavicular block offered a quick, safe, and reliable alternative for distal arm block. Further studies, comparing this approach with the classic infraclavicular block, are required to validate its efficacy, safety, and reliability.
Comment in
-
The Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Additional Advantages.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):733-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000318. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015. PMID: 26488085 No abstract available.
-
The Ultrasound-Guided Retroclavicular Block: Comparison With a Novel Subpectoral Approach.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):290. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000335. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 26890649 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Dr Vaghadia and Colleagues.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):290-1. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000356. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 26890650 No abstract available.
-
"Those Who Don't Remember the Past Are Condemned to Relive It": Dr. Alon P. Winnie and his Subclavian Perivascular Technique.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):418-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000400. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27093286 No abstract available.
-
New Brachial Plexus Blocks Highlight Issues With Traditional Axillary Approach.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):656-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000428. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27547906 No abstract available.
-
Ultrasound-Guided Retroclavicular Block (aka Posterior Approach Infraclavicular Block): Anatomical Variation of the Clavicle Limits Block Feasibility.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):658-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000456. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27547909 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical