Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0133061.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133061. eCollection 2015.

How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People!

Affiliations

How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People!

Ashkan Ebadi et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Funding has been viewed in the literature as one of the main determinants of scientific activities. Also, at an individual level, securing funding is one of the most important factors for a researcher, enabling him/her to carry out research projects. However, not everyone is successful in obtaining the necessary funds. The main objective of this work is to measure the effect of several important factors such as past productivity, scientific collaboration or career age of researchers, on the amount of funding that is allocated to them. For this purpose, the paper estimates a temporal non-linear multiple regression model. According to the results, although past productivity of researchers positively affects the funding level, our findings highlight the significant role of networking and collaboration. It was observed that being a member of large scientific teams and getting connected to productive researchers who have also a good control over the collaboration network and the flow of information can increase the chances for securing more money. In fact, our results show that in the quest for the research money it is more important how researchers build their collaboration network than what publications they produce and whether they are cited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Average funding per distinct researcher, 1996 to 2010.
Fig 2
Fig 2
a) Average number of papers per researcher, 1996 to 2010, b) Average number of papers versus average funding, 1996 to 2010.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Example of the procedure for counting the citations received by the articles.
Fig 4
Fig 4
a) 3-year average citation counts, 1996 to 2008, b) Normalized 3-year average citation counts versus normalized average funding, 1996 to 2008.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Network structure variables at the aggregate level.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Normalized average funding per distinct researcher versus career age.

References

    1. Griffith R., Redding S., & Van Reenen J. Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 2004; 86(4), 883–895.
    1. Klette T. J., & Kortum S. Innovating firms and aggregate innovation (No. w8819). National Bureau of Economic Research 2002.
    1. Oyo, B., Williams, D., & Barendsen, E. A system dynamics tool for higher education funding and quality policy analysis. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society 2008.
    1. Martin B. R. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance. Edward Elgar; 2003, Cheltenham, 7–29.
    1. Jacob B. A., & Lefgren L. The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of Public Economics 2011; 95(9), 1168–1177. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources