Do otolaryngology residency applicants relocate for training?
- PMID: 26228114
- PMCID: PMC4733437
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.25501
Do otolaryngology residency applicants relocate for training?
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: To determine whether there is an association between the geographic location of an applicant's undergraduate school, medical school, and residency program among matched otolaryngology residency applicants.
Study design: Observational.
Methods: Otolaryngology residency program applications to our institution from 2009 to 2013 were analyzed. The geographic location of each applicant's undergraduate education and medical education were collected. Online public records were queried to determine the residency program location of matched applicants. Applicants who did not match or who attended medical school outside the United States were excluded. Metro area, state, and region were determined according to US Census Bureau definitions.
Results: From 2009 to 2013, 1,089 (78%) of 1,405 applicants who matched into otolaryngology residency applied to our institution. The number of subjects who attended medical school and residency in the same geographic region was 241 (22%) for metropolitan area, 305 (28%) for state, and 436 (40%) for region. There was no difference in geographic location retention by gender or couples match status of the subject. United States Medical Licensing Exam step 1 scores correlated with an increased likelihood of subjects staying within the same geographic region (P = .03).
Conclusions: Most otolaryngology applicants leave their previous geographic area to attend residency. Based on these data, the authors recommend against giving weight to geography as a factor when inviting applicants to interview.
Level of evidence: NA.
Keywords: Otolaryngology; geography; match; residency.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Figures



Similar articles
-
An evaluation of geographic trends in the otolaryngology residency match: home is where the heart is.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 May 1;141(5):424-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0219. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015. PMID: 25763804
-
The Home Program Advantage in the Otolaryngology Residency Match.J Surg Educ. 2023 Dec;80(12):1877-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 25. J Surg Educ. 2023. PMID: 37634977
-
The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.Urology. 2021 Dec;158:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.093. Epub 2021 Jul 26. Urology. 2021. PMID: 34324912
-
Overview of the military orthopaedic surgery residency application and selection process.Mil Med. 2013 Sep;178(9):1016-23. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00121. Mil Med. 2013. PMID: 24005552 Review.
-
The State of the Otolaryngology Match: A Review of Applicant Trends, "Impossible" Qualifications, and Implications.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun;156(6):985-990. doi: 10.1177/0194599817695804. Epub 2017 Mar 7. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017. PMID: 28319452 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar 10;6(2):188-194. doi: 10.1002/lio2.549. eCollection 2021 Apr. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 33869750 Free PMC article.
-
A novel algorithm to reduce bias and improve the quality and diversity of residency interviewees.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Sep 13;7(5):1367-1375. doi: 10.1002/lio2.908. eCollection 2022 Oct. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36258859 Free PMC article.
-
A Computer Simulation Model to Analyze the Application Process for Competitive Residency Programs.J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Feb;11(1):30-35. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00397.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 30805093 Free PMC article.
-
Geographic Trends in the Otolaryngology Match (2016-2020).OTO Open. 2021 Jun 16;5(2):2473974X211022611. doi: 10.1177/2473974X211022611. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. OTO Open. 2021. PMID: 34212122 Free PMC article.
-
The pain medicine fellowship landscape, an observational analysis.Interv Pain Med. 2022 Mar 25;1(2):100086. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100086. eCollection 2022 Jun. Interv Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 39239373 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Parker AM, Petroze RT, Schirmer BD, Calland JF. Surgical Residency Market Research—What are Applicants Looking For? Jour Surg Education. 2013;70(2):232–6. - PubMed
-
- Crace PP, Nounou J, Engel AM, Welling RE. Attracting Medical Students to Surgical Residency Programs. The American Surgeon. 2006;72:485–90. - PubMed
-
- Sharp S, Puscas L, Schwab B, Lee WT. Comparison of applicant criteria and program expectations for choosing residency programs in the otolaryngology match. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(2):174–9. doi:10.1177/0194599810391722. Epub 2011 Jan 4. - PubMed
-
- Nuthalapaty FS, Jackson JR, Owen J. The Influence of Quality-of-Life, Academic, and Workplace Factors on Residency Program Selection. Academic Medicine. 2004;79(5):417–25. - PubMed
-
- DeSantis M, Marco CA. Emergency Medicine Residency Selection: Factors Influencing Candidate Decisions. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(6):559–61. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials