Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul 30;17(7):e188.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.4721.

Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey

Deanna J Attai  1 , Michael S Cowher, Mohammed Al-Hamadani, Jody M Schoger, Alicia C Staley, Jeffrey Landercasper
Affiliations

Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey

Deanna J Attai et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Despite reported benefits, many women do not attend breast cancer support groups. Abundant online resources for support exist, but information regarding the effectiveness of participation is lacking. We report the results of a Twitter breast cancer support community participant survey.

Objective: The aim was to determine the effectiveness of social media as a tool for breast cancer patient education and decreasing anxiety.

Methods: The Breast Cancer Social Media Twitter support community (#BCSM) began in July 2011. Institutional review board approval with a waiver of informed consent was obtained for a deidentified survey that was posted for 2 weeks on Twitter and on the #BCSM blog and Facebook page.

Results: There were 206 respondents to the survey. In all, 92.7% (191/206) were female. Respondents reported increased knowledge about breast cancer in the following domains: overall knowledge (80.9%, 153/189), survivorship (85.7%, 162/189), metastatic breast cancer (79.4%, 150/189), cancer types and biology (70.9%, 134/189), clinical trials and research (66.1%, 125/189), treatment options (55.6%, 105/189), breast imaging (56.6%, 107/189), genetic testing and risk assessment (53.9%, 102/189), and radiotherapy (43.4%, 82/189). Participation led 31.2% (59/189) to seek a second opinion or bring additional information to the attention of their treatment team and 71.9% (136/189) reported plans to increase their outreach and advocacy efforts as a result of participation. Levels of reported anxiety before and after participation were analyzed: 29 of 43 (67%) patients who initially reported "high or extreme" anxiety reported "low or no" anxiety after participation (P<.001). Also, no patients initially reporting low or no anxiety before participation reported an increase to high or extreme anxiety after participation.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that breast cancer patients' perceived knowledge increases and their anxiety decreases by participation in a Twitter social media support group.

Keywords: breast cancer; education; patient outcome assessment; social media; social support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Deanna J Attai, Michael S Cowher, Mohammed Al-Hamadani, Jody M Schoger, and Jeffrey Landercasper have no disclosures. Alicia C Staley has the following disclosures: CEO of Akari Health; ePharma: Clinical Trials Speaker, Honorarium, January 2014; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Speaker, Honorarium February 2014; and Livestrong Conference Speaker, Honorarium, May 2014.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. 2013. Sep 10, [2015-04-28]. http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2013/Delivering-High-Quality-Ca... - PubMed
    1. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers . NAPBC Standards Manual 2014 Edition. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2014. [2015-04-28]. https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/napbc/2014%20napbc... .
    1. Lepore SJ, Buzaglo JS, Lieberman MA, Golant M, Davey A. Standard versus prosocial online support groups for distressed breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:379. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-379. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/379 1471-2407-11-379 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ussher JM, Kirsten L, Butow P, Sandoval M. A qualitative analysis of reasons for leaving, or not attending, a cancer support group. Soc Work Health Care. 2008;47(1):14–29. - PubMed
    1. Stephen J, Rojubally A, Macgregor K, McLeod D, Speca M, Taylor-Brown J, Fergus K, Collie K, Turner J, Sellick S, Mackenzie G. Evaluation of CancerChatCanada: a program of online support for Canadians affected by cancer. Curr Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(1):39–47. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1210. http://www.current-oncology.com/index.php/oncology/article/view/1210/1102 conc-20-39 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types