Immediate postoperative pain level from lumbar arthrodesis following epidural infiltration of morphine sulfate
- PMID: 26229898
- PMCID: PMC4519645
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.02.005
Immediate postoperative pain level from lumbar arthrodesis following epidural infiltration of morphine sulfate
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the pain level in patients treated with epidural infusion of morphine sulfate in a single dose, after a surgical procedure to perform lumber arthrodesis.
Methods: Forty patients underwent posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis or intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis via a posterior route at one, two or three levels. They were prospectively randomized into two groups of 20. In the first group (study group), 2 mg of morphine sulfate diluted in 10 mL of physiological serum was infiltrated into the epidural space, through the laminectomy area. The second group (controls) did not receive analgesia. The patients were asked about their pain levels before and after the operation, using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Results: It was found that the patients presented a significant diminution of pain as shown by the VAS. From before to after the operation, it decreased by an average of 4.7 points (p = 0.0001), which corresponded to 53.2% (p = 0.0001).
Conclusion: Application of 2 mg of morphine sulfate in a single epidural dose was shown to be a good technique for pain therapy following lumbar spinal surgery.
Objetivo: avaliar o nível de dor em pacientes tratados com infusão epidural de sulfato de morfina em Dose única, após procedimento cirúrgico de artrodese lombar.
Métodos: Foram submetidos à artrodese lombar posterolateral ou artrodese lombar intersomática por via posterior, em um, dois ou três níveis, 40 pacientes, divididos, prospectivos e randomizados em dois grupos de 20. No primeiro grupo (de estudo) foram infiltrados no espaço epidural, através da área da laminectomia, 2 mg de sulfato de morfina diluídos em 10 mL de soro fisiológico. O segundo grupo (controle) não recebeu analgesia. Os pacientes foram interrogados quanto ao nível de dor, no pré e pós-operatório, com o uso da escala visual analógica (EVA).
Resultados: Verificou-se que os pacientes apresentaram uma queda significativa da dor pela EVA. A dor entre o pré e o pós-operatório diminuiu em média 4,7 pontos (p = 0,0001), o que corresponde a 53,2% (p = 0,0001).
Conclusão: Aplicação de 2 mg de sulfato de morfina, em dose única epidural, demonstrou ser uma boa técnica na terapia da dor após cirurgia na coluna lombar.
Keywords: Arthrodesis; Epidural analgesia; Morphine; Postoperative pain; Vertebral fusion.
Similar articles
-
A prospective evaluation of anesthesia for posterior lumbar spine fusion: the effectiveness of preoperative epidural anesthesia with morphine.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):863-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158879.26544.69. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 15834327 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of lumbar epidural tramadol and lumbar epidural morphine for pain relief after thoracotomy: a repeated-dose study.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005 Aug;19(4):468-74. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2005.05.013. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005. PMID: 16085251 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective randomized study of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain in the patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: continuous subcutaneous morphine, continuous epidural morphine, and diclofenac sodium.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2357-61. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184377.31427.fa. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 16261108 Clinical Trial.
-
Preemptive epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief after lumbar laminectomy.Anesth Analg. 1997 Jul;85(1):135-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199707000-00024. Anesth Analg. 1997. PMID: 9212136 Clinical Trial.
-
Postoperative analgesia after lumbar laminectomy: epidural fentanyl infusion versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine.Anesth Analg. 1995 Mar;80(3):511-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199503000-00013. Anesth Analg. 1995. PMID: 7864416 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Bianconi M., Ferraro L., Ricci R., Zanoli G., Antonelli T., Giulia B. The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation after spine fusion surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(1):166–172. - PubMed
-
- Cohen B.E., Hartman M.B., Wade J.T., Miller J.S., Gilbert R., Chapman T.M. Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine (Phila PA 1976) 1997;22(16):1892–1896. - PubMed
-
- Gottschalk A., Freitag M., Tank S., Burmeister M.A., Kreil S., Kothe R. Quality of postoperative pain using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter after major lumbar spinal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(1):175–180. - PubMed
-
- Blumenthal S., Min K., Nadig M., Borgeat A. Double epidural catheter with ropivacaine versus intravenous morphine: a comparison for postoperative analgesia after scoliosis correction surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(1):175–180. - PubMed
-
- Lowry K.J., Tobias J., Kittle D., Burd T., Gaines R.W. Postoperative pain control using epidural catheters after anterior spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis. Spine (Phila PA 1976) 2001;26(11):1290–1293. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources