The effect of early, comprehensive genomic testing on clinical care in neonatal diabetes: an international cohort study
- PMID: 26231457
- PMCID: PMC4772451
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60098-8
The effect of early, comprehensive genomic testing on clinical care in neonatal diabetes: an international cohort study
Abstract
Background: Traditional genetic testing focusses on analysis of one or a few genes according to clinical features; this approach is changing as improved sequencing methods enable simultaneous analysis of several genes. Neonatal diabetes is the presenting feature of many discrete clinical phenotypes defined by different genetic causes. Genetic subtype defines treatment, with improved glycaemic control on sulfonylurea treatment for most patients with potassium channel mutations. We investigated the effect of early, comprehensive testing of all known genetic causes of neonatal diabetes.
Methods: In this large, international, cohort study, we studied patients with neonatal diabetes diagnosed with diabetes before 6 months of age who were referred from 79 countries. We identified mutations by comprehensive genetic testing including Sanger sequencing, 6q24 methylation analysis, and targeted next-generation sequencing of all known neonatal diabetes genes.
Findings: Between January, 2000, and August, 2013, genetic testing was done in 1020 patients (571 boys, 449 girls). Mutations in the potassium channel genes were the most common cause (n=390) of neonatal diabetes, but were identified less frequently in consanguineous families (12% in consanguineous families vs 46% in non-consanguineous families; p<0·0001). Median duration of diabetes at the time of genetic testing decreased from more than 4 years before 2005 to less than 3 months after 2012. Earlier referral for genetic testing affected the clinical phenotype. In patients with genetically diagnosed Wolcott-Rallison syndrome, 23 (88%) of 26 patients tested within 3 months from diagnosis had isolated diabetes, compared with three (17%) of 18 patients referred later (>4 years; p<0·0001), in whom skeletal and liver involvement was common. Similarly, for patients with genetically diagnosed transient neonatal diabetes, the diabetes had remitted in only ten (10%) of 101 patients tested early (<3 months) compared with 60 (100%) of the 60 later referrals (p<0·0001).
Interpretation: Patients are now referred for genetic testing closer to their presentation with neonatal diabetes. Comprehensive testing of all causes identified causal mutations in more than 80% of cases. The genetic result predicts the best diabetes treatment and development of related features. This model represents a new framework for clinical care with genetic diagnosis preceding development of clinical features and guiding clinical management.
Funding: Wellcome Trust and Diabetes UK.
Copyright © 2015 De Franco et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures




Comment in
-
Genetics and neonatal diabetes: towards precision medicine.Lancet. 2015 Sep 5;386(9997):934-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61428-3. Epub 2015 Jul 28. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 26231461 No abstract available.
-
Paediatric endocrinology: Paradigm shift in genetic testing for neonatal diabetes mellitus--new framework for clinical care.Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015 Oct;11(10):565. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.135. Epub 2015 Aug 18. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015. PMID: 26284444 No abstract available.
References
-
- Edghill EL, Dix RJ, Flanagan SE. HLA genotyping supports a nonautoimmune etiology in patients diagnosed with diabetes under the age of 6 months. Diabetes. 2006;55:1895–1898. - PubMed
-
- Iafusco D, Stazi MA, Cotichini R, the Early Onset Diabetes Study Group of the Italian Society of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Permanent diabetes mellitus in the first year of life. Diabetologia. 2002;45:798–804. - PubMed
-
- Gloyn AL, Pearson ER, Antcliff JF. Activating mutations in the gene encoding the ATP-sensitive potassium-channel subunit Kir6.2 and permanent neonatal diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1838–1849. - PubMed