Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;81(20):7067-77.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02032-15. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

Toolbox Approaches Using Molecular Markers and 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Data Sets for Identification of Fecal Pollution in Surface Water

Affiliations

Toolbox Approaches Using Molecular Markers and 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Data Sets for Identification of Fecal Pollution in Surface Water

W Ahmed et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

In this study, host-associated molecular markers and bacterial 16S rRNA gene community analysis using high-throughput sequencing were used to identify the sources of fecal pollution in environmental waters in Brisbane, Australia. A total of 92 fecal and composite wastewater samples were collected from different host groups (cat, cattle, dog, horse, human, and kangaroo), and 18 water samples were collected from six sites (BR1 to BR6) along the Brisbane River in Queensland, Australia. Bacterial communities in the fecal, wastewater, and river water samples were sequenced. Water samples were also tested for the presence of bird-associated (GFD), cattle-associated (CowM3), horse-associated, and human-associated (HF183) molecular markers, to provide multiple lines of evidence regarding the possible presence of fecal pollution associated with specific hosts. Among the 18 water samples tested, 83%, 33%, 17%, and 17% were real-time PCR positive for the GFD, HF183, CowM3, and horse markers, respectively. Among the potential sources of fecal pollution in water samples from the river, DNA sequencing tended to show relatively small contributions from wastewater treatment plants (up to 13% of sequence reads). Contributions from other animal sources were rarely detected and were very small (<3% of sequence reads). Source contributions determined via sequence analysis versus detection of molecular markers showed variable agreement. A lack of relationships among fecal indicator bacteria, host-associated molecular markers, and 16S rRNA gene community analysis data was also observed. Nonetheless, we show that bacterial community and host-associated molecular marker analyses can be combined to identify potential sources of fecal pollution in an urban river. This study is a proof of concept, and based on the results, we recommend using bacterial community analysis (where possible) along with PCR detection or quantification of host-associated molecular markers to provide information on the sources of fecal pollution in waterways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Map of the Brisbane River, showing sampling sites.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Distribution of the 15 most abundant orders among samples (11 samples per group, with sequence numbers normalized). A total of 148 orders were identified among all samples.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of all source-specific samples and water samples (11 samples subsampled to 25,000 sequences). A total of 99 axes were required to explain total variance.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of samples clustered in the center of Fig. 3. A total of 55 axes were required to explain total variance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tallon P, Magajna B, Lofranco C, Leung KT. 2005. Microbial indicators of faecal contamination in water: a current perspective. Water Air Soil Pollut 166:139–166. doi:10.1007/s11270-005-7905-4. - DOI
    1. Griffith JF, Cao YP, McGee CD, Weisberg SB. 2009. Evaluation of rapid methods and novel indicators for assessing microbiological beach water quality. Water Res 43:4900–4907. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmed W, Sritharan T, Palmer A, Sidhu JPS, Toze S. 2013. Evaluation of bovine feces-associated microbial source tracking markers and their correlations with fecal indicators and zoonotic pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:2682–2691. doi:10.1128/AEM.03234-12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harwood VJ, Levine AD, Scott TM, Chivukula V, Lukasik J, Farrah SR, Rose JB. 2005. Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed water and public health protection. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3163–3170. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.6.3163-3170.2005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McQuaig S, Griffith J, Harwood VJ. 2012. The association of fecal indicator bacteria with human viruses and microbial source tracking markers at coastal beaches impacted by nonpoint source pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6423–6432. doi:10.1128/AEM.00024-12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data