Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec:58:33-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.07.075. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

NIEHS/FDA CLARITY-BPA research program update

Affiliations
Review

NIEHS/FDA CLARITY-BPA research program update

Jerrold J Heindel et al. Reprod Toxicol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical used in the production of numerous consumer products resulting in potential daily human exposure to this chemical. The FDA previously evaluated the body of BPA toxicology data and determined that BPA is safe at current exposure levels. Although consistent with the assessment of some other regulatory agencies around the world, this determination of BPA safety continues to be debated in scientific and popular publications, resulting in conflicting messages to the public. Thus, the National Toxicology Program (NTP), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) developed a consortium-based research program to link more effectively a variety of hypothesis-based research investigations and guideline-compliant safety testing with BPA. This collaboration is known as the Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on BPA Toxicity (CLARITY-BPA). This paper provides a detailed description of the conduct of the study and a midterm update on progress of the CLARITY-BPA research program.

Keywords: Bisphenol A; CLARITY-BPA; Consortium; Endocrine disruptors; FDA; NIEHS; NTP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of the study design as described in the text. The planned animal assessment times for core chronic and specialty studies are indicated; continuous and stop dose arms are not depicted.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Serum BPA-G measurements in vehicle, 2.5, and 25 μg BPA/kg bw/day animals from the BPA core chronic study. Vehicle (continuous and stop dose arms) and BPA-dosed (continuous arm only) males and females were evaluated. At a single time point within one week of termination at 12 months of age, rats from each of the 5 housing rooms of the core chronic study and representing all 5 study loads were sampled from the tail vein to provide approximately 0.5 ml of blood. The blood sample from animals in the continuous dosing arm was drawn 15–60 min after gavage, approximately Cmax following gavage administration [8]. Rats from the vehicle control stop dose arm were sampled at approximately the same time of the day. Serum samples were analyzed by LC–MS/MS blinded to treatment group. The limit of detection (LOD) was established on each day of analysis and the range is indicated by the two horizontal lines on the graph. Red symbols indicate BPA-G measurements that were <LOD and are indicated as 1/2 LOD. X-axis labels, their definitions, and number of animals sampled are as follows: 0 Cont F and 0 Cont M represent continuous dose vehicle control females and males, respectively, n = 13/sex; 0 Stop F and 0 Stop M represent stop dose vehicle control females and males, respectively, n = 10/sex; 2.5 Cont F and 2.5 Cont M represent continuous dose 2.5 μg BPA/kg bw/day females and males, respectively, n = 15/sex; 25 Cont F and 25 Cont M represent continuous dose 25 μg BPA/kg bw/day females and males, respectively, n = 15/sex.

References

    1. FDA [Food and Drug Administration] Bisphenol A (BPA): Use in Food Contact Application. FDA [Food and Drug Administration]; Jul 6, 2012. 2012, Available from: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/ucm064437.htm.
    1. McCarty LS, Borgert CJ, Mihaich EM. Information quality in regulatory decision making: peer review versus good laboratory practice. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(7):927–934. - PMC - PubMed
    1. NTP [National Toxicology Program] Technical Report. NTP [National Toxicology Program]; Oct 21, 2014. Descriptions of NTP study types. 2014, Available from: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/testing/types/index.html.
    1. NTP [National Toxicology Program] NIH Publication 82-1771. NTP [National Toxicology Program]; 1982. NTP technical report on the carcinogenesis bioassay of bisphenol A (CAS no. 80-05-7) in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice (feed study) - PubMed
    1. OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] OECD Series on Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and Compliance Monitoring. OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]; Sep 12, 2012. 2012, Available from: http://www.oecd.org/env/chemicalsafetyandbiosafety/testingofchemicals/oe....

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources