Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul 15:6:953.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00953. eCollection 2015.

Mental health problems in adolescents with cochlear implants: peer problems persist after controlling for additional handicaps

Affiliations

Mental health problems in adolescents with cochlear implants: peer problems persist after controlling for additional handicaps

Maria Huber et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The aims of the present multi-center study were to investigate the extent of mental health problems in adolescents with a hearing loss and cochlear implants (CIs) in comparison to normal hearing (NH) peers and to investigate possible relations between the extent of mental health problems of young CI users and hearing variables, such as age at implantation, or functional gain of CI. The survey included 140 adolescents with CI (mean age = 14.7, SD = 1.5 years) and 140 NH adolescents (mean age = 14.8, SD = 1.4 years), their parents and teachers. Participants were matched by age, gender and social background. Within the CI group, 35 adolescents were identified as "risk cases" due to possible and manifest additional handicaps, and 11 adolescents were non-classifiable. Mental health problems were assessed with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in the versions "Self," "Parent," and "Teacher." The CI group showed significantly more "Peer Problems" than the NH group. When the CI group was split into a "risk-group" (35 "risk cases" and 11 non-classifiable persons) and a "non-risk group" (n = 94), increased peer problems were perceived in both CI subgroups by adolescents themselves. However, no further differences between the CI non-risk group and the NH group were observed in any rater. The CI risk-group showed significantly more hyperactivity compared to the NH group and more hyperactivity and conduct problems compared to the CI non-risk group. Cluster analyses confirmed that there were significantly more adolescents with high problems in the CI risk-group compared to the CI non-risk group and the NH group. Adolescents with CI, who were able to understand speech in noise had significantly less difficulties compared to constricted CI users. Parents, teachers, and clinicians should be aware that CI users with additionally special needs may have mental health problems. However, peer problems were also experienced by CI adolescents without additional handicaps.

Keywords: SDQ; adolescents; cochlear implants; hearing loss; mental health problems; multi handicap; multi-center study; peer problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box-plots of SDQ self- parent- and teacher-ratings for emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity and peer problems as well as pro-social behavior in normally hearing (NH) adolescents and CI adolescents with (risk) and without (non-risk) additional handicaps. CI adolescents without additional handicaps differ from NH adolescents only in their self-rated peer problems. CI adolescents with additional risks differ from NH adolescents not only in peer problems, but also in hyperactivity and from CI adolescents without additional risks in conduct problems. Higher scores indicate more problems. Circles (°) and asterisks (*) indicate extreme cases and outliers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. (2007). Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 120, 898–921. 10.1542/peds.2007-2333 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
    1. Anmyr L., Larsson K., Olsson M., Freijd A. (2012). Strengths and difficulties in children with cochlear implants–comparing self-reports with reports from parents and teachers. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 76, 1107–1112. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.04.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aschendorff A., Laszig R., Maier W., Beck R., Schild C., Birkenhäger R., et al. . (2009). [Cochlear implant for malformations of the inner ear]. [Article in German]. HNO 5, 533–541. 10.1007/s00106-009-1936-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Backenson E. M., Holland S. C., Kubas H. A., Fitzer K. R., Wilcox G., Carmichael J. A., et al. . (2013). Psychosocial and adaptive deficits associated with learning disability subtypes. J. Learn. Disabil. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1177/0022219413511861 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources