Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:408175.
doi: 10.1155/2015/408175. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

Use of Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether for the Treatment of Refractory Intrahepatic Biliary Strictures and Bile Casts: A Modern Perspective

Affiliations

Use of Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether for the Treatment of Refractory Intrahepatic Biliary Strictures and Bile Casts: A Modern Perspective

Gregory Kim et al. Case Rep Surg. 2015.

Abstract

Cholelithiasis is a prevalent problem in the United States with 14% or more adults affected. Definitive treatment of cholelithiasis is cholecystectomy. When cholecystectomy yields minimal resolution treatment options include expectant management of asymptomatic gallstones or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram. We present a case of intrahepatic biliary casts where surgical option was not possible, interventional radiology was unsuccessful, and methyl tert-butyl ether was used to dissolve the biliary obstruction. Dissolution therapy of gallstones was first reported in 1722 when Vollisnieri used turpentine in vitro. While diethyl ether has excellent solubilizing capacity, its low boiling point limited its use surgically as it vaporizes immediately. Diethyl ether can expand 120-fold during warming to body temperature after injection into the biliary system making it impractical for routine use. The use of dissolution is out of favor due to the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Epidemiological studies have shown the general population should have minimal concerns from passive exposure. Dissolution using MTBE remains a viable option if surgical or endoscopic options are not available. However, because of risks involved to both the patient and the staff, careful multidisciplinary team approach must be undertaken to minimize the risks and provide the best possible care to the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

References

    1. Peery A. F., Dellon E. S., Lund J., et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(5):1179.e1–1187.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Festi D., Reggiani M. L. B., Attili A. F., et al. Natural history of gallstone disease: expectant management or active treatment? Results from a population-based cohort study. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2010;25(4):719–724. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06146.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakorafas G. H., Milingos D., Peros G. Asymptomatic cholelithiasis: is cholecystectomy really needed? A critical reappraisal 15 years after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2007;52(5):1313–1325. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9107-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nenner R. P., Imperato P. J., Rosenberg C., Ronberg E. Increased cholecystectomy rates among Medicare patients after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Community Health. 1994;19(6):409–415. doi: 10.1007/bf02260323. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen M. J., Borody T. J., May G. R., Bugliosi T. F., Larusso N. F., Thistle J. L. Cholelitholysis using methyl tertiary butyl ether. Gastroenterology. 1985;88(1, part 1):122–125. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(85)80143-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources