Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May-Jun;5(3):147-56.
doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.158014.

Zirconia in dental implantology: A review

Abhishek Apratim  1 , Prashanti Eachempati  1 , Kiran Kumar Krishnappa Salian  1 , Vijendra Singh  2 , Saurabh Chhabra  3 , Sanket Shah  4
Affiliations
Review

Zirconia in dental implantology: A review

Abhishek Apratim et al. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Titanium has been the most popular material of choice for dental implantology over the past few decades. Its properties have been found to be most suitable for the success of implant treatment. But recently, zirconia is slowly emerging as one of the materials which might replace the gold standard of dental implant, i.e., titanium.

Materials and methods: Literature was searched to retrieve information about zirconia dental implant and studies were critically analyzed. PubMed database was searched for information about zirconia dental implant regarding mechanical properties, osseointegration, surface roughness, biocompatibility, and soft tissue health around it. The literature search was limited to English language articles published from 1975 to 2015.

Results: A total of 45 papers met the inclusion criteria for this review, among the relevant search in the database.

Conclusion: Literature search showed that some of the properties of zirconia seem to be suitable for making it an ideal dental implant, such as biocompatibility, osseointegration, favourable soft tissue response and aesthetics due to light transmission and its color. At the same time, some studies also point out its drawbacks. It was also found that most of the studies on zirconia dental implants are short-term studies and there is a need for more long-term clinical trials to prove that zirconia is worth enough to replace titanium as a biomaterial in dental implantology.

Keywords: Biocompatibility; mechanical properties; osseointegration; surface roughening; titanium dental implant; zirconia; zirconia and biocompatibility; zirconia and implant surface coating; zirconia and osseointegration; zirconia dental implant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Kuboki T, Okamoto S, Suzuki H, Kanyama M, Arakawa H, Sonoyama W, et al. Quality of life assessment of bone-anchored fixed partial denture patients with unilateral mandibular distal-extension edentulism. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:182–7. - PubMed
    1. Depprich R, Zipprich H, Ommerborn M, Naujoks C, Wiesmann HP, Kiattavorncharoen S, et al. Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: An in vivo study. Head Face Med. 2008;4:30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steinemann SG. Titanium-the material of choice? Periodontol 2000. 1998;17:7–21. - PubMed
    1. Heydecke G, Kohal R, Gläser R. Optimal esthetics in single-tooth replacement with the Re-Implant system: A case report. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:184–9. - PubMed
    1. Tschernitschek H, Borchers L, Geurtsen W. Nonalloyed titanium as a bioinert metal-A review. Quintessence Int. 2005;36:523–30. - PubMed