Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jul 16:3:102.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00102. eCollection 2015.

Depot-Based Delivery Systems for Pro-Angiogenic Peptides: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Depot-Based Delivery Systems for Pro-Angiogenic Peptides: A Review

Amy H Van Hove et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Insufficient vascularization currently limits the size and complexity for all tissue engineering approaches. Additionally, increasing or re-initiating blood flow is the first step toward restoration of ischemic tissue homeostasis. However, no FDA-approved pro-angiogenic treatments exist, despite the many pre-clinical approaches that have been developed. The relatively small size of peptides gives advantages over protein-based treatments, specifically with respect to synthesis and stability. While many pro-angiogenic peptides have been identified and shown promising results in vitro and in vivo, the majority of biomaterials developed for pro-angiogenic drug delivery focus on protein delivery. This narrow focus limits pro-angiogenic therapeutics as peptides, similar to proteins, suffer from poor pharmacokinetics in vivo, necessitating the development of controlled release systems. This review discusses pro-angiogenic peptides and the biomaterials delivery systems that have been developed, or that could easily be adapted for peptide delivery, with a particular focus on depot-based delivery systems.

Keywords: angiogenesis; biomaterials; controlled release; depot-based; drug delivery; hydrogels; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A schematic of the process of angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is a process tightly controlled by a number of factors. (A) Ischemic tissue release pro-angiogenic signals, which diffuse into nearby tissue. (B) Pericytes detach from nearby vessels, and ECs form sprouts. (C) ECs proliferate and migrate towards the signal gradient. (D) ECs align into immature vessels. (E) Pericytes are recruited to the new vessels. (F) Vasculature is remodeled and stabilized. Many of the factors involved in this process have been exploited for pharmacological intervention, either supplementing them for pro-angiogenic applications, or inhibiting them for anti-angiogenic applications. EC, endothelial cell; HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; Ang2, angiopoietin 2; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; PLGF, placenta growth factor; SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor-1; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; Ang1, angiopoietin 1 (Ziche et al., ; Hirota and Semenza, ; Adams and Alitalo, ; Lieu et al., ; Chu and Wang, ; Brudno et al., 2013).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of drug release from biomaterial depots. Release of drugs from depot-based biomaterials can be controlled by a number of mechanisms. (A) Drug is encapsulated within a biomaterial with large enough mesh/pore size to allow for diffusive release of the encapsulated drug. (B) Drug is tethered to a biomaterial that degrades in response to enzyme expression and releases the drug upon degradation of the biomaterial. (C) Drug is tethered to the biomaterial by the enzymatically cleavable tether, and released upon linker cleavage. (D) Diffusive release of encapsulated drug is prolonged by affinity interactions between the material and the drug. (E) Diffusive release of encapsulated drug is prolonged by delayed dissolution of the drug. (F) Drug is encapsulated within a degradable biomaterial and released as the material degrades. Not to scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aachmann F. L., Larsen K. L., Wimmer R. (2012). Interactions of cyclodextrins with aromatic amino acids: a basis for protein interactions. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 73, 349–357.10.1007/s10847-011-0071-y - DOI
    1. Adams R. H., Alitalo K. (2007). Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 464–478.10.1038/nrm2183 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agu R. U., Ugwoke M. I., Armand M., Kinget R., Verbeke N. (2001). The lung as a route for systemic delivery of therapeutic proteins and peptides. Respir. Res. 2, 198–209.10.1186/rr58 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed T. A. E., Griffith M., Hincke M. (2007). Characterization and inhibition of fibrin hydrogel-degrading enzymes during development of tissue engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 13, 1469–1477.10.1089/ten.2006.0354 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akeson A. L., Woods C. W., Hsieh L. C., Bohnke R. A., Ackermann B. L., Chan K. Y., et al. (1996). AF12198, a novel low molecular weight antagonist, selectively binds the human type I interleukin (IL)-1 receptor and blocks in vivo responses to IL-1. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30517–30523.10.1074/jbc.271.48.30517 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources