Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul 3;3(3):713-23.
doi: 10.3390/jcm3030713.

The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing

Affiliations
Review

The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing

Sam Riedijk et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Pregnant couples tend to prefer a maximum of information about the health of their fetus. Therefore, we implemented whole genome microarray instead of conventional karyotyping (CK) for all indications for prenatal diagnosis (PND). The array detects more clinically relevant anomalies, including early onset disorders, not related to the indication and more genetic anomalies of yet unquantifiable risk, so-called susceptibility loci (SL) for mainly neurodevelopmental disorders. This manuscript highlights the psychological challenges in prenatal genetic counselling when using the array and provides counselling suggestions. First, we suggest that pre-test decision counselling should emphasize deliberation about what pregnant couples wish to learn about the future health of their fetus more than information about possible outcomes. Second, pregnant couples need support in dealing with SL. Therefore, in order to consider the SL in a proportionate perspective, the presence of phenotypes associated with SL in the family, the incidence of a particular SL in control populations and in postnatally ascertained patients needs highlighting during post-test genetic counselling. Finally, the decision that couples need to make about the course of their pregnancy is more complicated when the expected phenotype is variable and not quantifiable. Therefore, during post-test psychological counseling, couples should concretize the options of continuing and ending their pregnancy; all underlying feelings and thoughts should be made explicit, as well as the couple's resources, in order to attain adequate decision-making. As such, pre- and post-test counselling aids pregnant couples in handling the uncertainties that may accompany offering a broader scope of genetic PND using the array.

Keywords: SNP array analysis; counselling challenges; prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Breman A., Pursley A.N., Hixson P., Bi W., Ward P., Bacino C.A., Shaw C., Lupski J.R., Beaudet A., Patel A., et al. Penatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Prenat. Diagn. 2012;32:351–361. doi: 10.1002/pd.3861. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Srebniak M.I., Boter M., Oudesluijs G.O., Cohen-Overbeek T., Govaerts L.C., Diderich K.E., Oegema R., Knapen M.F., van de Laar I.M., Joosten M., et al. Genomic SNP array as a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of foetal ultrasound abnormalities. Mol. Cytogenet. 2012;5 doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wapner R.J., Martin C.L., Levy B., Ballif B.C., Eng C.M., Zachary J.M., Savage M., Platt L.D., Saltzman D., Grobman W.A., et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:2175–2184. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Jong A., Dondorp W.J., Macville M.V., de Die-Smulders C.E., van Lith J.M., de Wert G.M. Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: Ethical reflection. Hum. Genet. 2014;133:163–172. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1365-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dondorp W., Sikkema-Raddatz B., de Die-Smulders C., de Wert G. Arrays in postnatal and prenatal diagnosis: An exploration of the ethics of consent. Hum. Mutat. 2012;33:916–922. doi: 10.1002/humu.22068. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources