Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul 24;3(3):809-37.
doi: 10.3390/jcm3030809.

Chromosomal Mosaicism in Human Feto-Placental Development: Implications for Prenatal Diagnosis

Affiliations
Review

Chromosomal Mosaicism in Human Feto-Placental Development: Implications for Prenatal Diagnosis

Francesca Romana Grati. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Chromosomal mosaicism is one of the primary interpretative issues in prenatal diagnosis. In this review, the mechanisms underlying feto-placental chromosomal mosaicism are presented. Based on the substantial retrospective diagnostic experience with chorionic villi samples (CVS) of a prenatal diagnosis laboratory the following items are discussed: (i) The frequency of the different types of mosaicism (confined placental, CPM, and true fetal mosaicisms, TFM); (ii) The risk of fetal confirmation after the detection of a mosaic in CVS stratified by chromosome abnormality and placental tissue involvement; (iii) The frequency of uniparental disomy for imprinted chromosomes associated with CPM; (iv) The incidence of false-positive and false-negative results in CVS samples analyzed by only (semi-)direct preparation or long term culture; and (v) The implications of the presence of a feto-placental mosaicism for microarray analysis of CVS and non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS).

Keywords: amniocentesis; chorionic villi; chromosome mosaicism; confined placental mosaicism; cytotrophoblast; mesenchyme; non-invasive prenatal screening; true fetal mosaicism; uniparental disomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of mechanisms leading to chromosome mosaicism. (A) Mitotic non disjunction error involving an autosome: A mosaic 46,N/47,+chr is recovered in cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis; (B) Mitotic non-disjunction error involving a sex chromosome (X chromosome in the example): A mosaic 46,XX/47,XXX/45,X is present; (C) Meiotic non-disjunction error followed by trisomy rescue/anaphase lag: A mosaic 46,N/47,+chr is detectable.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Uniparental disomy (UPD) formation after the rescue of a trisomic zygote: Trisomy rescue/anaphase lag mechanism can result in the formation of a UPD or a biparental condition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic representation of the use of short tandem repeats (STRs) to determine the mechanism of formation of UPD. (A) Normal biparental STR profile: one paternal and one maternal allele at each informative locus is present; (B) Complete isodisomy due to post-zygotic reduplication of an homolog: homozygosity of all STRs markers is present; (C) Partial heterodisomy consequent to a non-disjunction error during meiosis II followed by trisomy rescue: homozygosity at pericentromeric STRs and heterozygosity interjected with homozygosity along chromosome arms are present; (D) Complete heterodisomy consequent to a non-disjunction error during meiosis I followed by trisomy rescue: informative STRs, pericentromeric and the p- and q-arms are all heterozygous and derived from only one parent.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Examples of UPD detected by SNP array; (AI) and (BI): full genome profile: chromosome 7 and 15 are highlighted as regions of homozygosity (ROH) by Genoglyphix software; (AII) and (BII): complete isodisomy of chromosome 7 (AII) consequent to post-zygotic reduplication of an homolog and (BII) partial isodisomy of chromosome 15 (from q14 to q26.2) between two regions of heterodisomy consequent of a non-disjunction error during meiosis II followed by trisomy rescue are depicted (courtesy of Signature Genomic Laboratories, a subsidiary of PerkinElmer, Wallac, Turku, Finland).

References

    1. Brambati B., Simoni G. Diagnosis of fetal trisomy 21 in first trimester. Lancet. 1983;1:586. - PubMed
    1. Simoni G., Fraccaro M., Gimelli G., Maggi F., Dagna Bricarelli F. False-positive and false-negative findings on chorionic villus sampling. Prenat. Diagn. 1987;7:671–672. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970070911. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miny P., Basaran S., Holzgreve W., Horst J., Pawlowitzki I.H., Ngo T.K. False negative cytogenetic result in direct preparations after CVS. Prenat. Diagn. 1988;8:633. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970080812. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tomkins D.J., Vekemans M.J. False-positive and false-negative cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling. Prenat. Diagn. 1989;9:139–140. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970090210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simoni G., Sirchia S.M. Confined placental mosaicism. Prenat. Diagn. 1994;14:1185–1189. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970141304. - DOI - PubMed