Building Successful Relationships in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial
- PMID: 26238208
- PMCID: PMC5571759
- DOI: 10.2174/1574887110666150731131743
Building Successful Relationships in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial
Abstract
Biomedical research cannot succeed without funding, knowledgeable staff, and appropriate infrastructure. There are however equally important but intangible factors that are rarely considered in planning large multidisciplinary endeavors or evaluating their success. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial required extensive collaborations between individuals from many fields, including clinicians, clinical trialists, and administrators; it also addressed questions across the spectrum of cancer prevention and control. In this manuscript, we examine the experiences and opinions of trial staff regarding the building of successful relationships in PLCO. We summarize, in narrative form, data collected using open-ended questionnaires that were administered to the National Cancer Institute project officers, coordinating center staff, screening center principal investigators, and screening center coordinators in 2015, about 3 years after publication of the final primary trial manuscript. Trust, respect, listening to others, and in-person interaction were frequently mentioned as crucial to building successful relationships.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.
References
-
- National Cancer Institute. Team science toolkit. Retrieved from: https://www.teamsciencetoolkit.cancer.gov/PublicAVhatIsTS.aspx on June 17, 2015.
-
- Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Greenwald P, Kramer BS. The PLCO Cancer Screening Trial: background, goals, organization, operations, results. Rev Rec Clin Trials. 2015;10(3) - PubMed
-
- Tuckman BW. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull. 1965;63(6):384–99. - PubMed
-
- National Institutes of Health. Collaboration and team science: a field guide. Retrieved from: https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/download/attachments/47284665/TeamSc... on June 17, 2015.
-
- Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP, Syme SL. The science of team science: assessing the value of transdisciplinary research. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2 Suppl):S77–S252. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical