Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep;17(9):630.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0630-8.

Work Stress as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease

Affiliations
Review

Work Stress as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease

Mika Kivimäki et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

The role of psychosocial work stress as a risk factor for chronic disease has been the subject of considerable debate. Many researchers argue in support of a causal connection while others remain skeptical and have argued that the effect on specific health conditions is either negligible or confounded. This review of evidence from over 600,000 men and women from 27 cohort studies in Europe, the USA and Japan suggests that work stressors, such as job strain and long working hours, are associated with a moderately elevated risk of incident coronary heart disease and stroke. The excess risk for exposed individuals is 10-40 % compared with those free of such stressors. Differences between men and women, younger versus older employees and workers from different socioeconomic backgrounds appear to be small, indicating that the association is robust. Meta-analyses of a wider range of health outcomes show additionally an association between work stress and type 2 diabetes, though not with common cancers or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, suggesting outcome specificity. Few studies have addressed whether mitigation of work stressors would reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. In view of the limited interventional evidence on benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness, definitive recommendations have not been made (e.g. by the US Preventive Services Taskforce) for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease via workplace stress reduction. Nevertheless, governments are already launching healthy workplace campaigns, and preventing excessive work stress is a legal obligation in several countries. Promoting awareness of the link between stress and health among both employers and workers is an important component of workplace health promotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Associations of work stressors with cardiovascular disease and other chronic conditions in recent meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies. Reference in parenthesis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Association of job strain with incident coronary heart disease risk in relation publication status for data, reverse causation testing and adjustments. (Adapted from: Kivimäki M, Nyberg ST, Batty GD, et al. Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2012; 380: 1491–7) [••]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies on job strain and incident coronary heart disease. Full references for the constituent studies are available in Appendix 1

References

    1. Resnik WH. The etiology of myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 1963;112:792. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1963.03860050179030. - DOI
    1. Karasek R, Baker D, Marxer F, Ahlbom A, Theorell T. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health. 1981;71:694–705. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.71.7.694. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Q. 1979;24:285–307. doi: 10.2307/2392498. - DOI
    1. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1:27–41. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferrie JE. Health consequences of job insecurity. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 1999;81:59–99. - PubMed

Publication types