Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;175(1):89-95.
doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2596-3. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in infants born at or near term

Prashanth Bhat  1 , Olie Chowdhury  2 , Sandeep Shetty  3 , Simon Hannam  4 , Gerrard F Rafferty  5 , Janet Peacock  6   7 , Anne Greenough  8   9
Affiliations

Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in infants born at or near term

Prashanth Bhat et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Our aims were to determine whether volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) or pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) reduced the time to successful extubation and if any difference was explained by a lower work of breathing (WOB), better respiratory muscle strength or less thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA) and associated with fewer hypocarbic episodes. Infants born at ≥34 weeks of gestational age were randomised to VTV or PLV. The WOB was assessed by the transdiaphragmatic pressure time product, respiratory muscle strength by the maximum inflation (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) pressures and TAA assessed using uncalibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography. Forty infants, median gestational age of 39 (range 34-42) weeks, were recruited. The time to successful extubation did not differ between the two groups (median 25, range 2.5-312 h (VTV) versus 33.5, 1.312 h (PLV)) (p = 0.461). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the WOB, respiratory muscle strength or the TAA results. The median number of hypocarbic episodes was 1.5 (range 0-8) in the VTV group versus 4 (range 1-13) in the PLV group (p = 0.005).

Conclusion: In infants born at or near term, VTV compared to PLV did not reduce the time to successful extubation but was associated with significantly fewer hypocarbic episodes.

What is known: In prematurely born infants, volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) compared to pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death. In addition, VTV is associated in prematurely born infants with lower incidences of pneumothorax, intraventricular haemorrhage and hypocarbic episodes.

What is new: Despite a high morbidity, few studies have investigated optimum ventilation strategies for infants born at or near term. In a RCT, we have demonstrated VTV versus PLV in infants ≥34 weeks gestation was associated with significantly fewer hypocarbic episodes.

Keywords: Extubation; Respiratory muscle strength; Thoracoabdominal asynchrony; Work of breathing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Semin Perinatol. 2006 Apr;30(2):81-8 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1654-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Feb;171(2):331-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Nov;171(11):1633-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Jul;97(4):F264-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources