The Functional Test for Agility Performance is a Reliable Quick Decision-Making Test for Skilled Water Polo Players
- PMID: 26240659
- PMCID: PMC4519206
- DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0044
The Functional Test for Agility Performance is a Reliable Quick Decision-Making Test for Skilled Water Polo Players
Abstract
The reliability of the Functional Test for Agility Performance has only been evaluated in water polo players in a small group of novice athletes. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the Functional Test for Agility Performance in skilled water polo players. Forty-two athletes (17.81 ± 3.24 years old) with a minimum of 5 years of competitive experience (7.05 ± 2.84 years) and playing at the national or international level were evaluated. The Functional Test for Agility Performance is characterized as a specific open decision-making test where a tested player moves as quickly as possible in accordance to a pass made by another player. The time spent in the test was measured by two experienced coaches. Descriptive statistics, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), 95% limit of agreement (LOA), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM) were used for data analysis. Athletes completed the Functional Test for Agility Performance in 4.15 0.47 s. The ICC value was 0.87 (95% IC = 0.80-0.92). The SEM varied between 0.24 and 0.38 s. The LOA was 1.20 s and the CV average considering each individual trial was 6%. The Functional Test for Agility Performance was shown to be a reliable quick decision-making test for skilled water polo players.
Keywords: aquatic sports; assessment; athletic performance; functional performance; training.
Figures
References
-
- Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26:217–238. - PubMed
-
- Beckerman H, Roebroeck M, Lankhorst G, Becher J, Bezemer P, Verbeek A. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:571–578. - PubMed
-
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–160. - PubMed
-
- Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther. 1994;74:777–788. - PubMed
-
- Escalante Y, Saavedra J, Mansilla M, Tella V. Discriminatory power of water polo game-related statistics at the 2008 Olympic Games. J Sports Sci. 2011;29:291–298. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources