[LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR BLADDER CANCER]
- PMID: 26242145
[LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR BLADDER CANCER]
Abstract
Radical cystectomy is the standard method for treatment of muscle-invasive and locally advanced bladder cancer. Several less invasive approaches have been suggested recently, including totally laparoscopic radical cystectomy and robotic cystectomy. However despite significant improvements in surgical techniques the overall occurrence of perioperative complications is still high. Analysis of the literature data and comparison of these data with the results of our study was performed with respect to perioperative complications after radical cystectomy and oncological outcomes. In most of the studies, operating time during laparoscopic cystectomy was longer than that of open approach. Despite that, there was no influence of type of surgery on intraoperative complications. Major complication rates were similar between all groups. However laparoscopic cystectomy had lower rate of minor complications compared to open cystectomy. Laparoscopic cystectomy is safe and associated with lower blood loss, decreased postoperative ileus and lower length of stay compared with open radical cystectomy. Laparoscopic surgery for bladder cancer decreased minor complications (mainly due to lower bleeding and gastrointestinal complication rate) and had no impact on major complications. Moreover, if performed following the oncologic principles of open surgery, our results and literature data suggest that LRC is safe and determines non-inferior long-term cancer control compared with open surgery.
Similar articles
-
The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications.Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):767-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 May 17. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21620562 Review.
-
Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a critical analysis.Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.076. Epub 2008 Apr 1. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 18403100 Review.
-
Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024. Epub 2009 Oct 20. Eur Urol. 2010. PMID: 19853987 Clinical Trial.
-
Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery.J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):554-9; discussion 559. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Dec 13. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19084856
-
Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a Latin American reference center: perioperative and oncological results.Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):635-41. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0168. Int Braz J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26401854 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the improved tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy technique following radical cystectomy in cases of invasive bladder cancer complicated by peritoneal metastasis.Oncol Lett. 2016 Feb;11(2):1401-1405. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.4045. Epub 2015 Dec 22. Oncol Lett. 2016. PMID: 26893750 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical