Psychometric evaluation of the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) as depression severity scale using the LEAD (Longitudinal Expert Assessment of All Data) as index of validity
- PMID: 26242577
- PMCID: PMC4526416
- DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0529-3
Psychometric evaluation of the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) as depression severity scale using the LEAD (Longitudinal Expert Assessment of All Data) as index of validity
Abstract
Background: The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) was developed to cover the universe of depressive symptoms in DSM-IV major depression as well as in ICD-10 mild, moderate, and severe depression. The objective of this study was to evaluate the standardization of the MDI as a depression severity scale using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as index of external validity in accordance with the LEAD approach (Longitudinal Expert Assessment of All Data).
Methods: We used data from two previously published studies in which the patients had a MINI Neuropsychiatric Interview verified diagnosis of DSM-IV major depression. The conventional VAS scores for no, mild, moderate, and severe depression were used for the standardization of the MDI.
Results: The inter-correlation for the MDI with the clinician ratings (VAS, MES, HAM-D17 and HAM-D6) increased over the rating weeks in terms of Pearson coefficients. After nine weeks of therapy the coefficient ranged from 0.74 to 0.83. Using the clinician-rated VAS depression severity scale, the conventional MDI cut-off scores for no or doubtful depression, and for mild, moderate and severe depression were confirmed.
Conclusions: Using the VAS as index of external, clinical validity, the standardization of the MDI as a measure of depression severity was accepted, with an MDI cut-off score of 21 for mild depression, 26 for moderate depression severity, and 31 for severe depression.
Trial registration: Martiny et al. Acta Psychiatr Scand 112:117-25, 2005: None - due to trial commencement date. Straaso et al. Acta Neuropsychiatr 26:272-9; 2014: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01353092 .
Figures


Similar articles
-
The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity.J Affect Disord. 2001 Oct;66(2-3):159-64. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00309-8. J Affect Disord. 2001. PMID: 11578668 Clinical Trial.
-
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5338. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385173 Review.
-
The internal and external validity of the Major Depression Inventory in measuring severity of depressive states.Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):351-6. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006724. Psychol Med. 2003. PMID: 12622314
-
Sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory in outpatients.BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Aug 9;7:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-39. BMC Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17688685 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Rating scales in depression: limitations and pitfalls.Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006;8(2):207-15. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.2/pbech. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16889106 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Psychometric properties of the 7-item game addiction scale among french and German speaking adults.BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 10;16:132. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0836-3. BMC Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27160387 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting Academic Performance: Analysis of Students' Mental Health Condition from Social Media Interactions.Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Mar 23;12(4):87. doi: 10.3390/bs12040087. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35447659 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual Minority Orientation Is Associated With Greater Psychological Impact Due to the COVID-19 Crisis-Evidence From a Longitudinal Cohort Study of Young Swiss Men.Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;9:692884. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.692884. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34746075 Free PMC article.
-
Physical work demands and expected labor market affiliation (ELMA): Prospective cohort with register-follow-up among 46 169 employees.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Nov 1;48(8):641-650. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4050. Epub 2022 Jul 5. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022. PMID: 35789276 Free PMC article.
-
Romantic relationship breakup: An experimental model to study effects of stress on depression (-like) symptoms.PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217320. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31150432 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bech P, Wermuth L. Applicability and validity of the Major Depression Inventory in patients with Parkinson's Disease. Nord J Psychiatry. 1998;52:305–309.
-
- Bech P. Clinical psychometrics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2012.
-
- American Psychiatric Association. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
-
- World Health Organization: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993.
-
- Olsen LR, Jensen DV, Noerholm V, Martiny K, Bech P. The internal and external validity of the Major Depression Inventory in measuring severity of depressive states. Psychol Med. 2003;33:351–356. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous