Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;18(3):310-6.
doi: 10.1007/s12094-015-1369-9. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

Prognostic factors affecting survival in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 110 patients

Affiliations

Prognostic factors affecting survival in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 110 patients

N Iqbal et al. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Data on treatment outcome and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are limited in the literature.

Methods: A total of 119 patients with metastatic STS treated between June 2003 and December 2012 were analyzed for treatment outcome and prognostic factors.

Results: Median age was 37 years (range 2-72 years) with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. Most common histologic subtypes were synovial sarcoma (36 %) and leiomyosarcoma (16 %). Median tumor size was 12 cm (range 1.6-30 cm). Twenty-four (20 %) patients were treated with multimodality therapy and 80 % patients received systemic chemotherapy alone. At a median follow-up of 10 months (range 1-66 months), the 2-year EFS and OS were 10 and 19 %, respectively, with a median EFS and OS of 6 and 10 months, respectively. Univariate analysis identified albumin ≤4 g/dl (p = 0.001), histologic subtypes other than synovial sarcoma (p = 0.02), non-extremity tumors (p = 0.03) and single modality treatment (p = 0.03) as factors predicting poor EFS; however, for OS, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dl (p = 0.02), tumor size >10 cm (p = 0.01) and single modality treatment (p = 0.04) were identified as poor prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis identified only serum albumin ≤4 g/dl (p = 0.002, HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.29-0.75) associated with poor EFS; however, for OS, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dl (p = 0.009, HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.29-0.83), tumor size >10 cm (p = 0.003, HR 2.11, 95 % CI 1.28-3.47) and single modality treatment (p = 0.01, HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.25-0.86) emerged as poor prognostic factors.

Conclusions: Serum albumin, tumor size, hemoglobin and treatment modality affect survival in metastatic STS.

Keywords: Metastatic disease; Prognostic factors; Soft tissue sarcoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 10;9(9):e107297 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 2006 Dec 1;107(11):2698-705 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 2011 Mar 1;117(5):1049-54 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Jan;113(1):37-49 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar;14(3):869-77 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources