Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;9(4):113-9.
doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2014.0053.

Revisiting topological properties and models of protein-protein interaction networks from the perspective of dataset evolution

Affiliations

Revisiting topological properties and models of protein-protein interaction networks from the perspective of dataset evolution

Mingyu Shao et al. IET Syst Biol. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are crucial for organisms. Many research efforts have thus been devoted to the study on the topological properties and models of PPI networks. However, existing studies did not always report consistent results on the topological properties of PPI networks. Although a number of PPI network models have been introduced, yet in the literature there is no convincing conclusion on which model is best for describing PPI networks. This situation is primarily caused by the incompleteness of current PPI datasets. To solve this problem, in this study, the authors propose to revisit the topological properties and models of PPI networks from the perspective of PPI dataset evolution. Concretely, they used 12 PPI datasets of Arabidopsis thaliana and 10 PPI datasets of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from different Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGRID) database versions, and compared the topological properties of these datasets and the fitting capabilities of five typical PPI network models over these datasets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Number of nodes/edges changes with the version of A. thaliana dataset a Number of node/edges against dataset version b Number of edge against number of node
Fig 2
Fig 2
Degree distributions of different A. thaliana datasets a Version 65 b Version 85 c Version 110
Fig 3
Fig 3
Topological properties of the GCs on the A. thaliana datasets of different versions a Average degree b Betweeness c 2/3/4‐hop reachability d Closeness e Average shortest path f Diameter g Clustering coefficient h Eccentricity
Fig 4
Fig 4
Ranks of the five models (BA, ER, ERDD, GEO and STICKY models) on different PPI data versions of a A. thaliana b S. cerevisiae Here, the X ‐axis denotes dataset version and the Y ‐axis denotes model rank by MRR

References

    1. Junker B.H. Schreiber F.: ‘Analysis of biological networks ’ (John Wiley & Sons, 2008. ), vol. 2
    1. Barabási A.‐L. Albert R.: ‘Emergence of scaling in random networks ’, Science, 1999, 286, (5439 ), pp. 509 –512 (doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 ) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barabasi A.‐L. Oltvai Z.N.: ‘Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization ’, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2004, 5, (2 ), pp. 101 –113 (doi: 10.1038/nrg1272 ) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albert R.: ‘Scale‐free networks in cell biology ’, J. Cell Sci., 2005, 118, (21 ), pp. 4947 –4957 (doi: 10.1242/jcs.02714 ) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pržulj N. Corneil D.G. Jurisica I.: ‘Modeling interactome: scale‐free or geometric? ’, Bioinformatics, 2004, 20, (18 ), pp. 3508 –3515 (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth436 ) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources