Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;65(4):251-4.
doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0562-z. Epub 2014 May 24.

Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy

Affiliations

Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy

Sandhyasri Panda et al. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical results of three techniques of hysterectomy- abdominal hysterectomy (AH), non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH), and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).

Methods: A simple prospective randomized study was performed in a tertiary care centre between June 2011 and Dec 2012, among 150 consecutive women indicated to undergo hysterectomy for benign and mobile uterine conditions. They were randomly assigned 50 each to three routes of hysterectomy; (abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal). Outcome measures including operating time, blood loss, rate of complications, consumption of analgesics, and length of hospital stay were assessed and compared between groups.

Results: As far as duration of operation, mean blood loss, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, P value was significant. Incidence of complications is least among VH group.

Conclusion: Vaginal hysterectomy is the gold standard in the era of minimal access surgery. Some of the contraindications to VH can be overcome by assistance of laparoscope and a potential abdominal hysterectomy can be converted to a vaginal procedure.

Keywords: AH; Hysterectomy; LAVH; NDVH.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clinch J. Length of hospital stay after vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(3):253–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13121.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reich H., De Caprio J., McGlynn F., 1989. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J. Gynecolo Surg, 5:213-216 Volume 335:512-513 August 15, 1996 Number 7.
    1. Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:841–848. - PubMed
    1. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328(7432):129–33. Epub 2004 Jan 7.[PMC free article] [PubMed]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kovac SR. Decision-directed hysterectomy: a possible approach to improve medical and economic outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71:159–169. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00316-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources