Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- PMID: 26244531
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000997
Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the cost to prevent one case of congenital syphilis or fetal or neonatal death with universal third-trimester syphilis rescreening in the United States and to estimate the incidence of syphilis seroconversion at which rescreening becomes cost-effective.
Methods: We created a decision model comparing universal third-trimester syphilis rescreening in women who screened negative in the first trimester with no rescreening. The assumed base case incidence of seroconversion was 0.012%. The primary outcome was the cost to prevent one case of congenital syphilis. Secondary outcomes included the cost to prevent one fetal or neonatal death and the number needed to rescreen to prevent one adverse outcome. A strategy was considered cost-effective if it cost less than $285,000 to prevent one case of congenital syphilis (the estimated long-term care cost).
Results: Under our assumptions, universal third-trimester rescreening would cost an additional $419,842 for each case of congenital syphilis prevented and $3,621,144 and $6,052,534, respectively, for each fetal and neonatal death prevented. Rescreening 4,000,000 women would prevent 60 cases of congenital syphilis and seven fetal and four neonatal deaths. Prevention of one case of congenital syphilis would require 65,790 women be rescreened. Seroconversion incidence of 0.017% would make third-trimester rescreening cost-effective.
Conclusion: Universal third-trimester syphilis rescreening requires a large number of women be rescreened at a high health care cost to prevent one adverse outcome from maternal syphilis. Seroconversion incidence must be 19-fold higher than the national average of primary and secondary syphilis in women for universal third-trimester rescreening to be cost-effective.
Similar articles
-
Repeat Screening for Syphilis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):699-707. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002795. Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30095767
-
Antenatal syphilis screening using point-of-care testing in Sub-Saharan African countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis.PLoS Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):e1001545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001545. Epub 2013 Nov 5. PLoS Med. 2013. PMID: 24223524 Free PMC article.
-
Using Surveillance Data to Respond to an Outbreak of Congenital Syphilis in Arizona Through Third-Trimester Screening Policies, 2017-2018.Public Health Rep. 2021 Jan/Feb;136(1):61-69. doi: 10.1177/0033354920967350. Epub 2020 Nov 19. Public Health Rep. 2021. PMID: 33211993 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of antenatal syphilis point of care testing on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0247649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247649. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33765040 Free PMC article.
-
Congenital syphilis.Semin Perinatol. 2018 Apr;42(3):176-184. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Apr 5. Semin Perinatol. 2018. PMID: 29627075 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-immune Hydrops Fetalis and Hepatic Dysfunction in a Preterm Infant With Congenital Syphilis.Front Pediatr. 2019 Dec 11;7:508. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00508. eCollection 2019. Front Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31921721 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Prenatal Screening and Treatment to Prevent Congenital Syphilis, Louisiana and Florida, 2013-2014.Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Aug;44(8):498-502. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000638. Sex Transm Dis. 2017. PMID: 28703731 Free PMC article.
-
Expanded prenatal syphilis screening in Manitoba, Canada: a direct short-term cost-avoidance analysis in an outbreak context.Can J Public Health. 2023 Apr;114(2):287-294. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00682-0. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Can J Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36068434 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with four atypical cases of congenital syphilis in England, 2016 to 2017: an ecological analysis.Euro Surveill. 2017 Dec;22(49):17-00750. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.49.17-00750. Euro Surveill. 2017. PMID: 29233254 Free PMC article.
-
The cost-effectiveness of syphilis screening in pregnant women: a systematic literature review.Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 21;12:1268653. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1268653. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38577277 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Patton ME, Su JR, Nelson R, Weinstock H; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Primary and secondary syphilis—United States, 2005–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63:402–6.
-
- Alexander JM, Sheffield JS, Sanchez PJ, Mayfield J, Wendel GD Jr. Efficacy of treatment for syphilis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:5–8.
-
- Webster LA, Rolfs RT. Surveillance for primary and secondary syphilis—United States, 1991. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1993;42:13–9.
-
- Stray-Pedersen B. Economic evaluation of maternal screening to prevent congenital syphilis. Sex Transm Dis 1983;10:167–72.
-
- Abyad A. Cost-effectiveness of antenatal screening for syphilis. Health Care Women Int 1995;16:323–8.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical