Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Sep;126(3):539-551.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002.

Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Kristen McMaster  1 , Luis Sanchez-Ramos, Andrew M Kaunitz
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Kristen McMaster et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate associations between Foley catheter use for cervical ripening and infectious morbidity.

Data sources: We searched computerized databases, references in published studies and textbook chapters without language restriction. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception through December 2014. MeSH headings used included the terms "Foley catheter," "Foley balloon," "prostaglandin," "labor induction," and "cervical ripening."

Methods of study selection: We identified randomized controlled trials that compared Foley catheter with locally applied (vaginal or cervical) prostaglandin preparations for cervical ripening or labor induction. Selected studies evaluated maternal or neonatal infection with at least one of the following outcomes: chorioamnionitis, endometritis, pooled maternal infection, and neonatal infection. Excluded studies used double-balloon catheters, outpatient Foley management, extraamniotic saline infusions, pregnancy termination, and oral administration of medication in the prostaglandin arm.

Tabulation, integration, and results: We identified 26 randomized trials including 5,563 women. Compared with prostaglandin preparations alone, patients who underwent cervical ripening with a Foley catheter had similar rates of chorioamnionitis (56/782 [7.2%] with Foley compared with 54/754 [7.2%] with prostaglandins; relative risk [RR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.38), endometritis (40/1,042 [3.8%] compared with 35/991 [3.5%]; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.66-1.6), pooled maternal infection (237/2,699 [8.8%] compared with 257/2,864 [9%]; RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.12), and neonatal infection (34/1,061 [3.2%] compared with 39/1,074 [3.6%]; RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.58-1.39). With subgroup analysis, excluding studies using preinsertion cervical cleansing or prophylactic antibiotics in the Foley arm, results were similar.

Conclusion: Use of transcervical Foley catheters for cervical ripening and induction of labor is not associated with an increased risk of infectious morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:418–29.
    1. Loto OM, Ikuomola AA, Ayuba II, Onwudiegwu U. Comparative study of the outcome of induction of labor using 25 µg and 50 µg of vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:2359–62.
    1. Heinemann J, Gillen G, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:177–87.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006–12.
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al.. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.