Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;86(4):232-6.
doi: 10.1111/ans.13257. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

Systematic review of the impact of sacral neuromodulation on clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal physiology

Naseem Mirbagheri  1   2 , Yogeesan Sivakumaran  1 , Natasha Nassar  1   3 , Marc A Gladman  1   2
Affiliations

Systematic review of the impact of sacral neuromodulation on clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal physiology

Naseem Mirbagheri et al. ANZ J Surg. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has emerged as a treatment option for faecal incontinence (FI). However, its objective effect on symptoms and anorectal function is inconsistently described. This study aimed to systematically review the impact of SNM on clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal physiology in patients with FI, including factors that may predict treatment outcome.

Methods: An electronic search of MEDLINE (1946-2014)/EMBASE database was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles that reported the relevant outcome measures following SNM were included. Clinical outcomes evaluated included: frequency of FI episodes, FI severity score and success rates. Its impact on anorectal and gastrointestinal physiology was also evaluated.

Results: Of 554 citations identified, data were extracted from 81 eligible studies. Meta-analysis of the data was precluded due to lack of a comparison group in most studies. After permanent SNM, 'perfect' continence was noted in 13-88% of patients. Most studies reported a reduction in weekly FI episodes (median difference of the mean -7.0 (range: -24.8 to -2.7)) and Wexner scores (median difference of the mean -9 (-14.9 to -6)). A trend towards improved resting and squeeze anal pressures and a reduction in rectal sensory volumes were noted. Studies failed to identify any consistent impact on other physiological parameters or clinicophysiological factors associated with success.

Conclusion: SNM improves clinical symptoms and reduces number of incontinence episodes and severity scores in patients with FI, in part by improving anorectal physiological function. However, intervention studies with standardized outcome measures and physiological techniques are required to robustly assess the physiological impact of SNM.

Keywords: anorectal physiology; faecal incontinence; sacral nerve stimulation; sacral neuromodulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the systematic review process as per PRISMA 2009 guidelines.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kalantar JS, Howell S, Talley NJ. Prevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors; an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community? Med. J. Aust. 2002; 176: 54–57. - PubMed
    1. Ng KS, Nassar N, Hamd K, Nagarajah A, Gladman MA. Prevalence of functional bowel disorders and faecal incontinence: an Australian primary care survey. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 17: 150–159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma A, Marshall RJ, Macmillan AK, Merrie AE, Reid P, Bissett IP. Determining levels of fecal incontinence in the community: a New Zealand cross‐sectional study. Dis. Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1381–1387. - PubMed
    1. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1996; 91: 33–36. - PubMed
    1. Brown HW, Wexner SD, Segall MM, Brezoczky KL, Lukacz ES. Quality of life impact in women with accidental bowel leakage. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2012; 66: 1109–1116. - PubMed

Publication types