Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;25(2):293-302.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1096-2. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

Content validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) items in the context of HIV clinical care

Affiliations

Content validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) items in the context of HIV clinical care

Todd C Edwards et al. Qual Life Res. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess content validity and patient and provider prioritization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression, anxiety, fatigue, and alcohol use items in the context of clinical care for people living with HIV (PLWH), and to develop and assess new items as needed.

Methods: We conducted concept elicitation interviews (n = 161), item pool matching, prioritization focus groups (n = 227 participants), and cognitive interviews (n = 48) with English-speaking (~75 %) and Spanish-speaking (~25 %) PLWH from clinical sites in Seattle, San Diego, Birmingham, and Boston. For each domain we also conducted item review and prioritization with two HIV provider panels of 3-8 members each.

Results: Among items most highly prioritized by PLWH and providers were those that included information regarding personal impacts of the concept being assessed, in addition to severity level. Items that addressed impact were considered most actionable for clinical care. We developed additional items addressing this. For depression we developed items related to suicide and other forms of self-harm, and for all domains we developed items addressing impacts PLWH and/or providers indicated were particularly relevant to clinical care. Across the 4 domains, 16 new items were retained for further psychometric testing.

Conclusion: PLWH and providers had priorities for what they believed providers should know to provide optimal care for PLWH. Incorporation of these priorities into clinical assessments used in clinical care of PLWH may facilitate patient-centered care.

Keywords: Clinical practice; HIV; PROMIS; Patient-centered outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have conflicts of interest to report associated with this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Procedure Steps

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jensen RE, Rothrock NE, DeWitt EM, et al. The Role of Technical Advances in the Adoption and Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in Clinical Care. Med Care. 2015;53:153–159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kozak MS, Mugavero MJ, Ye J, et al. Patient reported outcomes in routine care: advancing data capture for HIV cohort research. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:141–147. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, et al. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research. 2012;21:1305–1314. - PubMed
    1. Haroutiunian S, Donaldson G, Yu J, Lipman AG. Development and validation of shortened, restructured Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey instrument (the S-TOPS) for assessment of individual pain patients’ health-related quality of life. Pain. 2012;153:1593–1601. - PubMed
    1. Brubaker L, Khullar V, Piault E, et al. Goal attainment scaling in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: development and pilot testing of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:937–946. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources