Impact of Aortic Valve Stenosis on Coronary Hemodynamics and the Instantaneous Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
- PMID: 26245891
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002443
Impact of Aortic Valve Stenosis on Coronary Hemodynamics and the Instantaneous Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Abstract
Background: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) induces compensatory alterations in left ventricular hemodynamics, leading to physiological and pathological alterations in coronary hemodynamics. Relief of AS by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) decreases ventricular afterload and is expected to improve microvascular function immediately. We evaluated the effect of AS on coronary hemodynamics and the immediate effect of TAVI.
Methods and results: Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity were simultaneously assessed at rest and at maximal hyperemia in an unobstructed coronary artery in 27 patients with AS before and immediately after TAVI and in 28 patients without AS. Baseline flow velocity was higher and baseline microvascular resistance was lower in patients with AS as compared with controls, which remained unaltered post-TAVI. In patients with AS, hyperemic flow velocity was significantly lower as compared with controls (44.5±14.5 versus 54.3±18.6 cm/s; P=0.04). Hyperemic microvascular resistance (expressed in mm Hg·cm·s(-1)) was 2.10±0.69 in patients with AS as compared with 1.80±0.60 in controls (P=0.096). Coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with AS was lower, 1.9±0.5 versus 2.7±0.7 in controls (P<0.001). Improvement in coronary hemodynamics after TAVI was most pronounced in patients without post-TAVI aortic regurgitation. In these patients (n=20), hyperemic flow velocity increased significantly from 46.24±15.47 pre-TAVI to 56.56±17.44 cm/s post-TAVI (P=0.003). Hyperemic microvascular resistance decreased from 2.03±0.71 to 1.66±0.45 (P=0.050). Coronary flow velocity reserve increased significantly from 1.9±0.4 to 2.2±0.6 (P=0.009).
Conclusions: The vasodilatory reserve capacity of the coronary circulation is reduced in AS. TAVI induces an immediate decrease in hyperemic microvascular resistance and a concomitant increase in hyperemic flow velocity, resulting in immediate improvement in coronary vasodilatory reserve.
Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; coronary circulation; coronary microvascular function; coronary microvascular resistance; coronary physiology; transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
Comment in
-
Demystifying Complex Coronary Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Sowing the Seeds for Coronary Physiological Assessment in the Future?Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;8(8):e002909. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002909. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 26245892 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Transcatheter Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Normalizes Cardiac-Coronary Interaction by Restoration of Systolic Coronary Flow Dynamics as Assessed by Wave Intensity Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e002356. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002356. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27001805
-
Determining the Predominant Lesion in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Stenoses: A Multicenter Study Using Intracoronary Pressure and Flow.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec;12(12):e008263. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008263. Epub 2019 Nov 22. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019. PMID: 31752515 Free PMC article.
-
Coronary blood flow in patients with severe aortic stenosis before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 15;114(8):1264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.054. Epub 2014 Jul 30. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25173443
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: anesthetic considerations.Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1453-62. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819b07ce. Anesth Analg. 2009. PMID: 19372319 Review.
-
Myocardial ischemia in aortic stenosis: insights from arterial pulse-wave dynamics after percutaneous aortic valve replacement.Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2013 Aug;23(6):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Feb 8. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2013. PMID: 23395429 Review.
Cited by
-
Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Patients with Concomitant Severe Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease: A Closer Look to the Unresolved Perplexity.J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 11;10(8):1617. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081617. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33920349 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When?Interv Cardiol. 2018 May;13(2):69-76. doi: 10.15420/icr.2018:2:2. Interv Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29928311 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of Impella for Hemodynamic Support in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Apr 23;20(6):44. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0644-9. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018. PMID: 29682687 Review.
-
Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions.J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 22;2020:4603169. doi: 10.1155/2020/4603169. eCollection 2020. J Interv Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32774184 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physiological Versus Angiographic Guidance for Myocardial Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e012618. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012618. Epub 2019 Nov 13. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31718439 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials