Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;32(21):3301-3320.
doi: 10.1177/0886260515597441. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

Reproductive Coercion by Male Sexual Partners: Associations With Partner Violence and College Women's Sexual Health

Jennifer Katz  1 , Ellen L Poleshuck  2 , Brittany Beach  1 , Rachel Olin  1
Affiliations

Reproductive Coercion by Male Sexual Partners: Associations With Partner Violence and College Women's Sexual Health

Jennifer Katz et al. J Interpers Violence. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Reproductive coercion (RC) involves indirect and direct partner behaviors that interfere with effective contraceptive use. RC has been identified as a correlate of intimate partner violence (IPV) among ethnically diverse women sampled from urban health clinics or shelters. Research is needed to determine whether RC is experienced more generally by young women and, if so, whether RC is associated with IPV, multiple indicators of sexual health, or both. In the present study, sexually active undergraduate women ( N = 223, 80% Caucasian/White) provided self-report data on their sexual health and behaviorally specific lifetime experiences of both RC and partner physical violence. About 30% reported experiencing RC from a male sexual partner. Most commonly, RC involved condom manipulation or refusal within an adolescent dating relationship. Experiences of RC and partner violence were not independent; half of the women who reported RC also reported experiencing partner physical violence. Women with a history of RC reported a significantly reduced rate of contraceptive use during last vaginal sex and lower contraceptive and sexual self-efficacy. Additional research on the sociocultural and relational contexts of RC is needed.

Keywords: contraception; contraceptive efficacy; intimate partner violence; sexual health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Amaro H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447. - PubMed
    1. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, … Stevens MR. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    1. Chamberlain L, & Levenson R. (2012). Addressing intimate partner violence, reproductive and sexual coercion: A guide for obstetric, gynecologic, and reproductive health care settings. Family Violence Prevention Fund; Retrieved from www.futureswithoutviolence.org/userfiles/file/HealthCare/Repro_Guide.pdf
    1. Coker AL (2007). Does physical partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8, 149–177. doi:10.1177/1524838007301162 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gee RE, Mitra N, Wan F, Chavkin DE, & Long JA (2009). Power over parity: Intimate partner violence and issues of fertility control. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 201, 148.e1–7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.048 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources